Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 ISSEP Exam - Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Lisa is the project manager of the SQL project for her company. She has completed the risk response planning with her project team and is now ready to update the risk register to reflect the risk response. Which of the following statements best describes the level of detail Lisa should include with the risk responses she has created
D) The level of detail should correspond with the priority ranking.
A) The level of detail must define exactly the risk response for each identified risk.
B) The level of detail is set of project risk governance.
C) The level of detail is set by historical information.

ISC2 ISSEP Exam - Topic 4 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's ISSEP exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 4
[All ISSEP Questions]

Lisa is the project manager of the SQL project for her company. She has completed the risk response planning with her project team and is now ready to update the risk register to reflect the risk response. Which of the following statements best describes the level of detail Lisa should include with the risk responses she has created

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Hubert at Aug 03, 2025, 12:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ISSEP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Wilford
7 months ago
Historical info can help, but it shouldn't be the only factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
7 months ago
Totally agree, prioritization is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
7 months ago
Wait, does that mean less detail for lower priority risks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
7 months ago
I feel like exact definitions are necessary for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
8 months ago
I think the level of detail should match the priority ranking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
8 months ago
I feel like the priority ranking is key here; it makes sense that higher risks would require more detailed responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused about whether the historical information really dictates the level of detail or if it's more about the current project's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
8 months ago
I think we practiced a question similar to this, and I recall that prioritizing risks can influence how detailed the responses need to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
9 months ago
I remember discussing how the level of detail in risk responses should match the project's complexity, but I'm not sure if it should be exact for each risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
9 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The level of detail should be defined exactly for each identified risk, so I'll select option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
9 months ago
I think the key here is to understand that the level of detail should correspond to the priority ranking of the risks. The higher the priority, the more detailed the risk response should be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand the key details they're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about risk response planning. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about the level of detail required for the risk register.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 months ago
C is just weird. Historical information has nothing to do with the level of detail required in the risk register. That's just nonsense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
10 months ago
A seems too strict. We don't need to define the risk response exactly, just enough detail to address the risk effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
10 months ago
That could be true too, it's important to have clear responses for each risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
11 months ago
But shouldn't the level of detail define exactly the risk response for each identified risk?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
11 months ago
I agree with Felicitas, it makes sense to prioritize the risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
11 months ago
I think the level of detail should correspond with the priority ranking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. The level of detail should correspond with the priority ranking of the risks. Makes sense to prioritize the responses based on the significance of the risks.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
10 months ago
I see your point, but I still think C could be relevant. Historical information can provide valuable insights for determining the level of detail in risk responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
11 months ago
I think A might also be a good choice. Defining the risk response for each identified risk can ensure clarity and consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
11 months ago
I agree, it's important to focus on the high priority risks first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
11 months ago
I agree with you, D does make sense. It's important to focus on the high priority risks first.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel