Which of the following user authentications are supported by the SSH-1 protocol but not by the SSH-2 protocol? Each correct answer represents a complete solution. Choose all that apply.
Suggested Answer: A, B, C
Get Premium ISSAP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Answer option D is incorrect. Password-based authentication is supported by both the SSH-1 and SSH-2 protocols.
11 comments · newest first
SO
Sommer
11 months ago
I didn't know TIS was even a thing, sounds kinda outdated!
LA
Latrice
12 months ago
Password-based auth is in both, right?
ST
Staci
12 months ago
Wait, are you sure about Rhosts? I thought SSH-2 had it too.
JA
Jaclyn
12 months ago
Totally agree, TIS and Rhosts are the odd ones out!
CR
Craig
1 year ago
A and B are the ones that SSH-1 supports but SSH-2 doesn't.
EV
Evan
1 year ago
I feel like Kerberos is a common method, but I can't recall if it was specific to SSH-1 or if it was also in SSH-2.
NG
Nguyet
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about Rhosts authentication; I think it was mentioned that it's not supported in SSH-2.
DO
Dorothea
1 year ago
I think TIS authentication is one of the options, but I'm not entirely sure if it's exclusive to SSH-1.
AM
Amie
1 year ago
Password-based authentication seems like it should be in both, but I guess I need to double-check if it's listed as exclusive to SSH-1.
AR
Argelia
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The question is asking about an attack that prevents intended users from accessing a system or network. That sounds like a denial of service attack to me, so I'm going with A.
RE
Remona
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to use secure protocols and configure the network to block spoofing. Monitoring for CRP caches with an IDS could also be helpful, but the other two options seem more directly relevant to the session hijacking issue.