Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 ISSAP Exam - Topic 2 Question 66 Discussion

Posted by Jade on Mar 23, 2023 at 08:42 AM

Which of the following authentication methods prevents unauthorized execution of code on remote systems?

Suggested Answer: B, C, D

process is responsible for supporting and building up the incident combating process. It ensures the stability of the system and also confirms

that the incident does not get any worse. The Containment phase includes the process of preventing further contamination of the system or

network, and preserving the evidence of the contamination.

The loss done to the system due to spamming is recovered using the recovery phase. The Recovery phase of the Incident handling process is

the stage at which the enterprise or the system is settled back to its balanced production state. It involves the quality assurance tests and

re-evaluation of the system for the purpose of the system revival or recovery.

The Eradication phase of the Incident handling process involves the cleaning-up of the identified harmful incidents from the system. It includes

the analyzing of the information that has been gathered for determining how the attack was committed. To prevent the incident from

happening again, it is vital to recognize how it was conceded out so that a prevention technique is applied.


Get Premium ISSAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
TI
Tijuana 11 months ago
Totally agree, RADIUS is the go-to for many setups!
DO
Domingo 11 months ago
Wait, does S-RPC really prevent unauthorized code execution?
LU
Luis 12 months ago
CHAP is outdated, not the best choice anymore.
XO
Xochitl 12 months ago
I think TACACS is more secure than RADIUS.
HA
Hassie 12 months ago
RADIUS is commonly used for remote authentication.
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
I practiced a question like this, and I think S-RPC was mentioned as a method for secure remote procedure calls, but I’m not confident it fits this scenario.
RO
Roslyn 1 year ago
CHAP sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses code execution. I feel like it’s more about password protection during authentication.
CO
Cory 1 year ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember RADIUS being mentioned in a similar context. It’s used for network access, but does it really prevent unauthorized code execution?
RO
Rosamond 1 year ago
I think TACACS might be the right choice since it’s often used for device management and can provide more control over user permissions.
CR
Cruz 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one, but I think it might have something to do with the message itself and the producer or destination. I'll need to review my notes on message tracing to be more confident.
KA
Katy 1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got it! Installing WebLogic binaries on a remote machine using Node Manager is the one that can't be fully automated with a WLST script. That would likely require some manual setup and configuration steps.
SH
Sheridan 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure, but I remember something about product development. However, this seems more focused on services they already provide.
TE
Tegan 1 year ago
RADIUS? More like 'RADIUS of Suspicion' when it comes to remote code execution, am I right?
MA
Matthew 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
C) RADIUS
WE
Weldon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
I agree, RADIUS can be a bit suspicious when it comes to remote code execution.
CA
Carma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
D) CHAP
VI
Virgina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
C) RADIUS
LI
Lizette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
B) S-RPC
AR
Arlen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Tegan
A) TACACS
CO
Cordelia 1 year ago
I heard CHAP stands for 'Choking Hackers with Access Passwords'. Sounds like a pretty effective method to me!
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
TACACS? Isn't that just for controlling network access? I don't think it has anything to do with remote code execution.
DA
Daniela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
C) RADIUS
ET
Ettie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
TACACS is actually used for controlling network access, not preventing unauthorized execution of code on remote systems.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
D) CHAP
PE
Pearlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
C) RADIUS is the authentication method that prevents unauthorized execution of code on remote systems.
CL
Clay 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
TACACS is primarily used for controlling network access.
TE
Terrilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
D) CHAP
ED
Edelmira 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
C) RADIUS
EZ
Ezekiel 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
C) RADIUS
TE
Tequila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
B) S-RPC
IS
Isadora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
B) S-RPC
MY
My 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
A) TACACS
MA
Margarita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cecilia
A) TACACS
CE
Celia 1 year ago
S-RPC? What is that even? I'll have to look that one up. Sounds like a made-up option.
DU
Dudley 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure RADIUS is not the right answer for this. It's more for authentication and authorization, not code execution prevention.
CE
Celestine 2 years ago
CHAP seems like the way to go here. Preventing unauthorized code execution is crucial for security.
DY
Dyan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Celestine
I think TACACS could also be a good option for preventing unauthorized code execution.
CA
Cammy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Celestine
I agree, CHAP is a good choice for preventing unauthorized code execution.
AL
Alica 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think TACACS also helps in preventing unauthorized code execution.
ED
Edison 2 years ago
I agree with Brande, CHAP prevents unauthorized code execution.
BR
Brande 2 years ago
I think the answer is D) CHAP.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel