MENU
Which of the following is the BEST example of weak management commitment to the protection of security assets and resources?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium HCISPP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
41 comments · newest first
BU
Buffy
11 months ago
Not sure about that, weak management can show in many ways.
DY
Dyan
11 months ago
I’m surprised D isn’t the top choice, incidents show real commitment issues!
TA
Tarra
11 months ago
C is a huge issue too, variances can lead to major problems.
JU
Justine
11 months ago
I think B could also fit, immature controls are a big red flag.
MA
Malika
11 months ago
Definitely A, poor governance is a clear sign.
AU
Audrie
12 months ago
Unanticipated increases in security incidents seem more like a result of weak management rather than a direct example of it, so I’m not sure about D.
DO
Dominque
12 months ago
I feel like variances against regulatory requirements could also suggest weak commitment, but I’m leaning towards A as the strongest example.
KA
Kassandra
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that linked weak management to immature security controls, which is option B.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
I think option A might be the best choice since poor governance usually indicates a lack of commitment from management.
TE
Terina
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. All of these options seem to indicate some kind of security weakness, but I'm not sure which one is the "BEST" example of weak management commitment. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BE
Ben
1 year ago
I've got this! Option A is clearly the best answer here. Poor governance over security processes and procedures is a clear sign of weak management commitment to protecting security assets and resources.
SH
Shawn
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which of these options is the best example of weak management commitment. I might need to review my notes on security governance and controls to decide.
MA
Mattie
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about management commitment to security. I'll carefully review each option and think about which one best represents weak management commitment.
ST
Staci
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options, and I want to make sure I understand the underlying concepts before selecting an answer. I'll need to review the material on AutoCloseable and Closeable to make sure I'm on the right track.
HO
Holley
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The passage is saying leaders need to be able to break down walls and build bridges, so I'm guessing the answer is not something like Facilitator or Appraiser. I'm leaning towards Forecaster, but I want to double-check the other options just to be sure.
CA
Camellia
1 year ago
I'm not too sure about this one. I'm leaning towards option B - "pkg list SUNWgzip", but I'm not confident that's the right approach. I'll have to review the command options again.
DA
Dana
1 year ago
The key information seems to be the $10,000 recorded amount, the $8,000 audit amount, and the $5,000 sampling interval. I think I can use that to figure out the projected error.
SH
Shalon
1 year ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the correct answer isn't 'all of the above' because that would be too easy. Where's the challenge in that?
EL
Elvis
1 year ago
C) variances against regulatory requirements
JU
Justine
1 year ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
BA
Barbra
1 year ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
CA
Carry
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. Immature security controls and procedures scream of management neglect. Although, maybe they're just really cheap and don't want to spend money on security upgrades. You know what they say, 'You get what you pay for!'
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
I'd go with D. Unanticipated increases in security incidents and threats are a glaring red flag that management isn't taking security seriously enough.
VE
Vernell
1 year ago
D) unanticipated increases in security incidents and threats
MA
Margret
1 year ago
C) variances against regulatory requirements
MA
Maryanne
1 year ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
DE
Deandrea
1 year ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
RO
Rory
2 years ago
I believe C) variances against regulatory requirements also shows weak management commitment. It indicates a disregard for compliance and security standards.
NO
Noel
2 years ago
I'm not sure, all the options seem like they could indicate weak management commitment. But I guess A is the best example since it's a root cause issue.
LY
Lynelle
1 year ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
HE
Helaine
1 year ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
KR
Kris
1 year ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
DA
Darrin
1 year ago
Yeah, poor governance can really show a lack of commitment.
MA
Macy
1 year ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
NI
Nichelle
2 years ago
I agree with Dannie. Weak management commitment can lead to poor governance and lack of oversight.
JO
Joni
2 years ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Poor governance over security processes is a clear sign of weak management commitment.
FR
Franchesca
1 year ago
That's also a good example of weak management commitment to security.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
KA
Kallie
1 year ago
I agree, poor governance is a red flag for weak management commitment.
CA
Cammy
1 year ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
DA
Dannie
2 years ago
I think A) poor governance over security processes and procedures is the best example.