New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 HCISPP Exam - Topic 7 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's HCISPP exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 7
[All HCISPP Questions]

Which of the following is the BEST example of weak management commitment to the protection of security assets and resources?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Refugia at Dec 09, 2023, 02:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HCISPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Buffy
3 months ago
Not sure about that, weak management can show in many ways.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
3 months ago
I’m surprised D isn’t the top choice, incidents show real commitment issues!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
3 months ago
C is a huge issue too, variances can lead to major problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
4 months ago
I think B could also fit, immature controls are a big red flag.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
4 months ago
Definitely A, poor governance is a clear sign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
4 months ago
Unanticipated increases in security incidents seem more like a result of weak management rather than a direct example of it, so I’m not sure about D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
4 months ago
I feel like variances against regulatory requirements could also suggest weak commitment, but I’m leaning towards A as the strongest example.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember a practice question that linked weak management to immature security controls, which is option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
5 months ago
I think option A might be the best choice since poor governance usually indicates a lack of commitment from management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. All of these options seem to indicate some kind of security weakness, but I'm not sure which one is the "BEST" example of weak management commitment. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I've got this! Option A is clearly the best answer here. Poor governance over security processes and procedures is a clear sign of weak management commitment to protecting security assets and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not entirely sure which of these options is the best example of weak management commitment. I might need to review my notes on security governance and controls to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about management commitment to security. I'll carefully review each option and think about which one best represents weak management commitment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few different options, and I want to make sure I understand the underlying concepts before selecting an answer. I'll need to review the material on AutoCloseable and Closeable to make sure I'm on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The passage is saying leaders need to be able to break down walls and build bridges, so I'm guessing the answer is not something like Facilitator or Appraiser. I'm leaning towards Forecaster, but I want to double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
5 months ago
I'm not too sure about this one. I'm leaning towards option B - "pkg list SUNWgzip", but I'm not confident that's the right approach. I'll have to review the command options again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
5 months ago
The key information seems to be the $10,000 recorded amount, the $8,000 audit amount, and the $5,000 sampling interval. I think I can use that to figure out the projected error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
10 months ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the correct answer isn't 'all of the above' because that would be too easy. Where's the challenge in that?
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
8 months ago
C) variances against regulatory requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
9 months ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carry
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards B. Immature security controls and procedures scream of management neglect. Although, maybe they're just really cheap and don't want to spend money on security upgrades. You know what they say, 'You get what you pay for!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
10 months ago
I'd go with D. Unanticipated increases in security incidents and threats are a glaring red flag that management isn't taking security seriously enough.
upvoted 0 times
Vernell
9 months ago
D) unanticipated increases in security incidents and threats
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
9 months ago
C) variances against regulatory requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
10 months ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
10 months ago
I believe C) variances against regulatory requirements also shows weak management commitment. It indicates a disregard for compliance and security standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
10 months ago
I'm not sure, all the options seem like they could indicate weak management commitment. But I guess A is the best example since it's a root cause issue.
upvoted 0 times
Lynelle
9 months ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
9 months ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
9 months ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
9 months ago
Yeah, poor governance can really show a lack of commitment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
9 months ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nichelle
11 months ago
I agree with Dannie. Weak management commitment can lead to poor governance and lack of oversight.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
11 months ago
Option A seems like the obvious choice here. Poor governance over security processes is a clear sign of weak management commitment.
upvoted 0 times
Franchesca
9 months ago
That's also a good example of weak management commitment to security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
10 months ago
B) immature security controls and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
10 months ago
I agree, poor governance is a red flag for weak management commitment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
10 months ago
A) poor governance over security processes and procedures
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dannie
11 months ago
I think A) poor governance over security processes and procedures is the best example.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel