Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 HCISPP Exam - Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Posted by Pamella on Dec 26, 2023 at 04:41 AM

When assessing an organization's security policy according to standards established by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 27001 and 27002, when can management responsibilities be defined?

Suggested Answer: E

Get Premium HCISPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
AN
Annice 11 months ago
Standards need to be defined first, right?
NO
Noel 11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying management can’t be defined without assets? That seems off.
KA
Kathrine 11 months ago
I think it’s more about the controls being in place.
SH
Shanda 11 months ago
I totally agree with that! Assets first!
TA
Tamekia 11 months ago
Management responsibilities can be defined once assets are clearly defined.
ED
Eden 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about this one. I thought procedures were important, but I can’t remember if they were the starting point for defining management roles.
VE
Veronika 12 months ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we practiced about controls and responsibilities. I think controls might come into play later in the process.
AL
Aliza 12 months ago
I think we discussed how standards need to be established first, but I can't recall if that was the only requirement for defining management responsibilities.
RE
Rebecka 1 year ago
I remember that management responsibilities can be defined early in the process, but I'm not sure if it’s tied specifically to asset definition.
LU
Luther 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The question is asking about when management responsibilities are defined, but the answer choices don't seem to directly address that. I'll have to think it through carefully.
TR
Truman 1 year ago
Alright, I've got a strategy for this. The key is understanding the relationship between assets, standards, controls, and procedures in the ISO framework. I think I can work this out.
DA
Dalene 1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. I know the ISO standards cover security policies, but I'm not sure exactly when management responsibilities come into play. I'll have to review that.
LA
Layla 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the ISO standards and when management responsibilities are defined.
DO
Dorcas 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. The question is asking about the path from the MRP group to the requirements type. I'll need to analyze each option and make sure I understand the full sequence.
LE
Lemuel 1 year ago
Easy, it's option B. Cisco Umbrella is a cloud security platform that blocks malicious domains and protects against threats like command-and-control callbacks.
XO
Xochitl 1 year ago
I remember hearing about how "financial disclosure" is important to avoid conflicts, but is that the answer here?
FR
Francoise 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a lot of factors to consider, like the dividend policies of other companies in the industry and the general level of interest rates. I'll need to think through all the options carefully.
PA
Paz 1 year ago
I'm gonna have to go with B. Gotta start with the standards, otherwise it's like building a house without a blueprint.
TA
Tayna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paz
Defining procedures without clear standards can lead to confusion and inconsistencies.
CY
Cyril 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paz
Without a blueprint, it's hard to ensure everyone is on the same page when it comes to security policies.
AN
Annett 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paz
Once the standards are defined, management responsibilities can be clearly outlined.
GL
Gladis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Paz
I agree, starting with the standards is crucial for setting the foundation.
WI
William 1 year ago
Option A? Really? Asset definition before management responsibilities? That's like putting the cart before the horse!
KE
Kenda 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Both make sense, but I think I'll go with C just to be safe.
GA
Gary 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenda
That makes sense, it's important to have controls in place for security policies.
DE
Desmond 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenda
I think management responsibilities can be defined when controls are put in place.
MA
Marci 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenda
I agree, having controls in place ensures that management responsibilities can be clearly defined.
LE
Leila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kenda
I think management responsibilities can be defined when controls are put in place.
BR
Britt 1 year ago
I believe management responsibilities can also be defined when assets are clearly defined, as it helps in understanding what needs to be protected.
JE
Jerry 1 year ago
I agree with Cathern, having controls in place ensures that management responsibilities are clear.
ME
Merri 1 year ago
I'm going with option C. Establishing controls should come before defining management responsibilities, don't you think?
MA
Marlon 2 years ago
Option B seems logical since the standards need to be defined first before management responsibilities can be outlined.
CA
Cathern 2 years ago
I think management responsibilities can be defined when controls are put in place.
GR
Graciela 2 years ago
I believe management responsibilities can also be defined when assets are clearly defined, as it helps in understanding what needs to be protected.
GO
Golda 2 years ago
I agree with Pearlene. Having controls in place ensures that management responsibilities are clear.
PE
Pearlene 2 years ago
I think management responsibilities can be defined when controls are put in place.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel