Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 HCISPP Exam - Topic 4 Question 94 Discussion

When controlling the type of supply, increasing the amount of generalists could contain costs because.
A) Generalists earn lower incomes than specialists
B) Generalists practice resource-intensive medicine and generate lower overall health care expenditures
C) Generalists use less hospital and laboratory services
D) All of the above

ISC2 HCISPP Exam - Topic 4 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's HCISPP exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 4
[All HCISPP Questions]

When controlling the type of supply, increasing the amount of generalists could contain costs because.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E

by Levi at Jul 14, 2024, 08:30 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HCISPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Almeta
8 months ago
Surprised to hear generalists can lower costs that much!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kent
8 months ago
All of the above makes sense to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
France
8 months ago
Not sure about B, though. Resource-intensive medicine? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
8 months ago
I think C is spot on! They definitely use fewer resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
8 months ago
Generalists usually earn less than specialists, that's true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
9 months ago
I think option D could be the best choice since it seems like all the statements could contribute to containing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
9 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question about resource-intensive medicine, but I can't recall if that supports option B or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think generalists might use fewer hospital resources, which could relate to option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
9 months ago
I remember discussing how generalists typically earn less than specialists, so maybe that's why option A could be correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
9 months ago
This is a tricky question. I'm not totally sure which option is the best explanation for how generalists can help contain costs. I'll have to review my notes and think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know generalists earn less than specialists, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason they can help contain costs. I'll have to think through the other options and see if I can figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the cost-saving benefits of using more generalist healthcare providers. I think the key is to focus on how generalists tend to use fewer resources and generate lower overall costs compared to specialists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The correct answer is D - all of the above. Generalists earn less, use fewer hospital and lab services, and generally have lower resource-intensive practices, so increasing their use can help control healthcare costs. I feel pretty confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
10 months ago
Okay, I think the key is to look for the option that mentions the administration server automatically handling the deployment to the managed servers. That sounds like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
10 months ago
If I remember correctly, every switch does get a unique address, but I'm kind of confused about the AV term being used here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 year ago
Definitely going with D. Can't go wrong with 'all of the above' when it comes to cost-saving measures, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
1 year ago
It makes sense to go with D, covering all bases for cost-saving measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
1 year ago
Generalists do tend to use less hospital and laboratory services, which can save money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
1 year ago
I agree, having more generalists can definitely help lower overall health care expenditures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 year ago
Absolutely, D seems like the safest bet for cost containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
1 year ago
Haha, I'm just hoping I don't end up as a 'generalist' when it comes to my exam preparation. Gotta be a specialist on this one!
upvoted 0 times
Shonda
1 year ago
B) Generalists practice resource-intensive medicine and generate lower overall health care expenditures
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
1 year ago
A) Generalists earn lower incomes than specialists
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brandon
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think B might be the correct answer. Generalists focus on preventive care and efficient use of resources, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
1 year ago
But wouldn't D) All of the above be the best answer since it includes all the reasons?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 year ago
Option D seems like the right answer. Generalists typically have lower incomes, use fewer resources, and generate lower overall costs compared to specialists.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
1 year ago
Definitely, having more generalists could lead to lower overall health care expenditures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
1 year ago
So it makes sense that increasing the amount of generalists could help contain costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
1 year ago
That's true, generalists also use less hospital and laboratory services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
I agree, generalists tend to earn lower incomes than specialists.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlie
1 year ago
I agree with Dominga, generalists tend to use less resources which can help contain costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Generalists use less hospital and laboratory services.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel