Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 HCISPP Exam - Topic 4 Question 94 Discussion

Posted by Levi on Jul 14, 2024 at 08:30 PM

When controlling the type of supply, increasing the amount of generalists could contain costs because.

Suggested Answer: E

Get Premium HCISPP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
32 comments · newest first
AL
Almeta 10 months ago
Surprised to hear generalists can lower costs that much!
KE
Kent 11 months ago
All of the above makes sense to me!
FR
France 11 months ago
Not sure about B, though. Resource-intensive medicine? Really?
KR
Krissy 11 months ago
I think C is spot on! They definitely use fewer resources.
LE
Lenna 11 months ago
Generalists usually earn less than specialists, that's true.
TY
Tyra 12 months ago
I think option D could be the best choice since it seems like all the statements could contribute to containing costs.
DE
Delisa 12 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question about resource-intensive medicine, but I can't recall if that supports option B or not.
HE
Hermila 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think generalists might use fewer hospital resources, which could relate to option C.
EM
Emilio 1 year ago
I remember discussing how generalists typically earn less than specialists, so maybe that's why option A could be correct?
CO
Corinne 1 year ago
This is a tricky question. I'm not totally sure which option is the best explanation for how generalists can help contain costs. I'll have to review my notes and think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
CH
Charlene 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know generalists earn less than specialists, but I'm not sure if that's the main reason they can help contain costs. I'll have to think through the other options and see if I can figure out the best answer.
NO
Norah 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the cost-saving benefits of using more generalist healthcare providers. I think the key is to focus on how generalists tend to use fewer resources and generate lower overall costs compared to specialists.
LA
Lavonne 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The correct answer is D - all of the above. Generalists earn less, use fewer hospital and lab services, and generally have lower resource-intensive practices, so increasing their use can help control healthcare costs. I feel pretty confident about this one.
TE
Tess 1 year ago
Okay, I think the key is to look for the option that mentions the administration server automatically handling the deployment to the managed servers. That sounds like the most efficient approach.
ED
Eden 1 year ago
If I remember correctly, every switch does get a unique address, but I'm kind of confused about the AV term being used here.
RE
Rene 1 year ago
Definitely going with D. Can't go wrong with 'all of the above' when it comes to cost-saving measures, am I right?
GE
Gearldine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rene
It makes sense to go with D, covering all bases for cost-saving measures.
AD
Adela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rene
Generalists do tend to use less hospital and laboratory services, which can save money in the long run.
AN
Anisha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rene
I agree, having more generalists can definitely help lower overall health care expenditures.
SA
Sanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Rene
Absolutely, D seems like the safest bet for cost containment.
OD
Odette 1 year ago
Haha, I'm just hoping I don't end up as a 'generalist' when it comes to my exam preparation. Gotta be a specialist on this one!
SH
Shonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Odette
B) Generalists practice resource-intensive medicine and generate lower overall health care expenditures
RA
Raelene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Odette
A) Generalists earn lower incomes than specialists
BR
Brandon 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B might be the correct answer. Generalists focus on preventive care and efficient use of resources, right?
JE
Jenise 2 years ago
But wouldn't D) All of the above be the best answer since it includes all the reasons?
AM
Amber 2 years ago
Option D seems like the right answer. Generalists typically have lower incomes, use fewer resources, and generate lower overall costs compared to specialists.
CR
Cristy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Amber
Definitely, having more generalists could lead to lower overall health care expenditures.
BE
Bette 1 year ago
↳ replying to Amber
So it makes sense that increasing the amount of generalists could help contain costs.
RI
Richelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Amber
That's true, generalists also use less hospital and laboratory services.
VO
Von 1 year ago
↳ replying to Amber
I agree, generalists tend to earn lower incomes than specialists.
AR
Arlie 2 years ago
I agree with Dominga, generalists tend to use less resources which can help contain costs.
DO
Dominga 2 years ago
I think the answer is C) Generalists use less hospital and laboratory services.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel