New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 HCISPP Exam - Topic 3 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's HCISPP exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 3
[All HCISPP Questions]

Which of the following types of technologies would be the MOST cost-effective method to provide a reactive control for protecting personnel in public areas?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Shawnta
3 days ago
D) Hire a guard to protect the public area? Really? That's the most expensive and least efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
8 days ago
I'd go with B) Enclose the personnel entry area with polycarbonate plastic. Seems more secure than a duress alarm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
13 days ago
C) Supply a duress alarm for personnel exposed to the public seems like the most practical and cost-effective option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
19 days ago
I’m uncertain about the polycarbonate enclosure; it could be a good barrier, but I wonder if it’s really the best value for protecting personnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
24 days ago
Mantraps seem effective, but I feel like they might be more costly to install and maintain compared to other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
29 days ago
I think we practiced a similar question about reactive controls, and I lean towards the duress alarm since it's less expensive than hiring a guard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
1 month ago
I remember discussing the cost implications of each option, but I'm not sure which one is the most cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 month ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. What exactly do they mean by "cost-effective"? I'll need to clarify that before I can make a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
1 month ago
The guard option seems the most straightforward, but it might be the most expensive in the long run. I'll have to do some research on the relative costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 months ago
I think the duress alarm could be the most cost-effective solution here. It provides a reactive control without the high cost of physical barriers or security personnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the cost-effectiveness of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel