New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 CSSLP Exam - Topic 8 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CSSLP exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 8
[All CSSLP Questions]

Which of the following is generally used in packages in order to determine the package or product tampering?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Tamper resistance is resistance tampered by the users of a product, package, or system, or the users who can physically access it. It includes

simple as well as complex devices. The complex device encrypts all the information between individual chips, or renders itself inoperable.

Tamper resistance is generally used in packages in order to determine package or product tampering.

Answer B is incorrect. Tamper evident specifies a process or device that makes unauthorized access to the protected object easily

detected.

Answer D is incorrect. Tamper proofing makes computers resistant to interference. Tamper proofing measures include automatic

removal of sensitive information, automatic shutdown, and automatic physical locking.

Answer C is incorrect. Tamper data is used to view and modify the HTTP or HTTPS headers and post parameters.


by Catalina at Feb 10, 2024, 05:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSSLP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Samira
3 months ago
Are we sure tamper evident is the right term? Sounds a bit vague.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
3 months ago
Totally agree, tamper evident is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
3 months ago
Wait, I thought tamper proof was the same as tamper evident?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
4 months ago
Tamper resistance is more about preventing access, not detecting it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
4 months ago
It's definitely B, tamper evident!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslee
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought all of these terms were related, but I think "tamper evident" is the one that shows if tampering has occurred.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
4 months ago
I feel like "tamper proof" was mentioned a lot, but it might not be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
I remember practicing a question about tamper resistance versus tamper evident, and I think the latter is what indicates if something has been opened.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
I think it's "tamper evident," but I'm not completely sure. We covered something similar in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
5 months ago
Okay, let me see if I can break this down. Tamper resistance means the package is designed to be difficult to open without leaving obvious signs. Tamper evident means there are clear visual indicators if the package has been tampered with. I think B is the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know there are different tamper-related concepts, but I'm having trouble remembering the exact differences between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about packaging security features. I'm pretty confident that the answer is B, tamper evident, since that's the standard way to detect if a package has been opened or tampered with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Is tamper proof the same as tamper evident? Or is that a different concept entirely? I want to make sure I understand the differences before I select an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 months ago
Whoa, this is intense! Shutting down the entire city's network? That's got to be some kind of advanced penetration testing, maybe even router-specific. I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it B - input maps? I remember something about input and output maps, but I'm not sure how that relates to grouping attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
5 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The client is aware of the assessment, so it's not a full unknown environment. I'll go with option A - Partially known environment testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevieve
5 months ago
This question is testing our understanding of accounting changes and error corrections. Based on the details provided, I believe the prospective approach is the correct answer, as the change in depreciation period is a change in accounting estimate, not a change in policy or an error correction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
5 months ago
I'm pretty certain it's Auto VPN since that's what Meraki uses for site-to-site connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
2 years ago
That's a good point, Mariann. Tamper proof does sound like a strong measure against tampering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be D) Tamper proof. It seems like the most secure option to prevent tampering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
2 years ago
I disagree with Rebecka. I believe the answer is A) Tamper resistance. It's about making it difficult to tamper with the package in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
2 years ago
I think the answer is B) Tamper evident. It makes sense to me because it shows if a package has been opened or tampered with.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel