New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISC2 CSSLP Exam - Topic 4 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CSSLP exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 4
[All CSSLP Questions]

An asset with a value of $600,000 is subject to a successful malicious attack threat twice a year. The asset has an exposure of 30 percent to the threat. What will be the annualized loss expectancy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Configuration auditing is a component of configuration management, which involves periodic checks to establish the consistency and

completeness of accounting information and to confirm that all configuration management policies are being followed. Configuration audits are

broken into functional and physical configuration audits. They occur either at delivery or at the moment of effecting the change. A functional

configuration audit ensures that functional and performance attributes of a configuration item are achieved, while a physical configuration

audit ensures that a configuration item is installed in accordance with the requirements of its detailed design documentation.

Answer D is incorrect. The configuration status accounting procedure is the ability to record and report on the configuration baselines

associated with each configuration item at any moment of time. It supports the functional and physical attributes of software at various points

in time, and performs systematic control of accounting to the identified attributes for the purpose of maintaining software integrity and

traceability throughout the software development life cycle.

Answer C is incorrect. Configuration control is a procedure of the Configuration management. Configuration control is a set of

processes and approval stages required to change a configuration item's attributes and to re-baseline them. It supports the change of the

functional and physical attributes of software at various points in time, and performs systematic control of changes to the identified attributes.

Answer A is incorrect. Configuration identification is the process of identifying the attributes that define every aspect of a configuration

item. A configuration item is a product (hardware and/or software) that has an end-user purpose. These attributes are recorded in

configuration documentation and baselined. Baselining an attribute forces formal configuration change control processes to be effected in the

event that these attributes are changed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Bettina
3 months ago
$180,000 seems more reasonable to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
3 months ago
I thought it would be lower, but I guess the exposure really adds up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
4 months ago
Wait, how can it be that high? Seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
4 months ago
Totally agree, that math checks out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hassie
4 months ago
The annualized loss expectancy is calculated as $600,000 * 30% * 2 = $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
4 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen this type of question before, and I think the answer might be $180,000, but I’m not entirely confident in my calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how to apply the exposure percentage here. Is it just a straightforward multiplication with the asset value?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to calculate potential losses based on threat frequency. I think it was something like $180,000 for this one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Altha
5 months ago
I think the annualized loss expectancy is calculated by multiplying the asset value by the exposure and the frequency of the threat, but I'm not completely sure about the formula.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the requirements for a custom config RQL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about the differences between the options here. I'll need to read the question again and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Can someone clarify what exactly the "four exception rules regarding trade conditions" are?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
9 months ago
This question is a real brainteaser! I bet the exam writers were cackling as they came up with this one. I'm going to go with B) $360,000 and hope for the best. If I'm wrong, at least I'll have a good story to tell at the next study group meeting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
9 months ago
Okay, let me think this through... The asset value is $600,000, the exposure is 30%, and the threat happens twice a year. So the loss per occurrence is $180,000, and the annualized loss expectancy is $180,000 x 2 = $360,000. I'm confident the answer is B) $180,000.
upvoted 0 times
Elenor
8 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's D) $540,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
8 months ago
Actually, I calculated it as C) $280,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
8 months ago
No, I believe it's B) $180,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
9 months ago
I think the answer is A) $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veronique
9 months ago
Haha, this question is a real head-scratcher! I'm going to go with C) $280,000 just to mix things up. Who knows, maybe the exam writers have a twisted sense of humor and want to see if we're paying attention.
upvoted 0 times
Dustin
8 months ago
I agree with C) $280,000. It seems like a reasonable estimate given the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
9 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) $180,000. I feel like the loss expectancy might be lower than expected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
9 months ago
I think the answer is A) $360,000. It makes sense based on the exposure and frequency of the threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosann
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The exposure is 30%, so the loss per occurrence should be $600,000 x 0.3 = $180,000. But the question says the annualized loss expectancy, so I think the correct answer is B) $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
Marget
8 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The annualized loss expectancy would be $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
8 months ago
That makes sense. So the correct answer is B) $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
9 months ago
So, it would be $180,000 x 2 = $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
9 months ago
I think the formula for annualized loss expectancy is loss per occurrence x frequency of occurrence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
9 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's $540,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
9 months ago
No, I think it's $280,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lourdes
10 months ago
I believe it's actually $180,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
10 months ago
I think the annualized loss expectancy is $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ranee
10 months ago
I think the answer is B) $180,000. The asset value is $600,000 and it has a 30% exposure to the threat, which means the potential loss is $180,000 per occurrence. Since the threat happens twice a year, the annualized loss expectancy is $180,000 x 2 = $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
Melda
10 months ago
I agree with you. So, $180,000 x 2 = $360,000. That makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
10 months ago
I believe the answer is A) $360,000. The annualized loss expectancy is calculated by multiplying the potential loss per occurrence ($180,000) by the frequency of the threat (twice a year).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuette
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be D) $540,000. Can someone explain the calculation to me?
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
10 months ago
I agree with Ryann, because the annualized loss expectancy is calculated by multiplying the asset value by the exposure and the frequency of the threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arleen
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the annualized loss expectancy is calculated by multiplying the asset value by the exposure and the frequency of the threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) $540,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) $360,000.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel