MENU
Why are packet filtering routers used in low-risk environments?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CISSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
DY
Dylan
11 months ago
Transparency is key, so C makes sense!
EL
Eleonora
12 months ago
I think they lack strong user authentication features.
ST
Stephaine
12 months ago
Wait, are they really that effective in low-risk environments?
AR
Arlean
12 months ago
Totally agree, especially with IP spoofing protection!
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
They’re fast and flexible, great for low-risk setups.
SH
Shawnda
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused because I thought packet filtering was more about security features like IP spoofing. Could that relate to option B?
AR
Arthur
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question about network security tools, and I think packet filtering routers are mainly about speed and transparency. So, maybe option C again?
TI
Timothy
1 year ago
I remember packet filtering routers being mentioned in class as being effective in low-risk environments, but I'm not sure why they wouldn't be used in higher-risk ones.
NO
Nobuko
1 year ago
I think they’re fast and flexible, which makes them suitable for low-risk environments. I might lean towards option C, but I need to double-check that.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the options to determine the best solution.
LU
Lucille
1 year ago
I think the answer is C - current and event. That seems like the most logical combination for an Inbound Action script.