Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 CISSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Why are packet filtering routers used in low-risk environments?
B) They are fast and flexible, and protect against Internet Protocol (IP) spoofing.
A) They are high-resolution source discrimination and identification tools.
C) They are fast, flexible, and transparent.
D) They enforce strong user authentication and audit tog generation.

ISC2 CISSP Exam - Topic 3 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CISSP exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 3
[All CISSP Questions]

Why are packet filtering routers used in low-risk environments?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Rolande at May 04, 2022, 07:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dylan
8 months ago
Transparency is key, so C makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
9 months ago
I think they lack strong user authentication features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
9 months ago
Wait, are they really that effective in low-risk environments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
9 months ago
Totally agree, especially with IP spoofing protection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
9 months ago
They’re fast and flexible, great for low-risk setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused because I thought packet filtering was more about security features like IP spoofing. Could that relate to option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question about network security tools, and I think packet filtering routers are mainly about speed and transparency. So, maybe option C again?
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
I remember packet filtering routers being mentioned in class as being effective in low-risk environments, but I'm not sure why they wouldn't be used in higher-risk ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
9 months ago
I think they’re fast and flexible, which makes them suitable for low-risk environments. I might lean towards option C, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
9 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and the options to determine the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
10 months ago
I think the answer is C - current and event. That seems like the most logical combination for an Inbound Action script.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel