Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 CISSP Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CISSP exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All CISSP Questions]

Which of the following BEST describes the use of network architecture in reducing corporate risks associated with mobile devices?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Abel at Jul 24, 2022, 09:07 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jacqueline
5 months ago
Segmentation is key to reducing risks, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
5 months ago
Wait, are DMZs really that effective for mobile devices?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
6 months ago
Closed applications model is a solid approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
6 months ago
I think split tunneling can actually weaken security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
6 months ago
DMZ monitoring is crucial for VPN security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
6 months ago
I vaguely remember that managing mobile devices in a DMZ is important, but I'm not confident if D is the best description here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
6 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like segmentation and monitoring are crucial for VPN access, so maybe C is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
6 months ago
I think split tunneling could be risky, but I can't recall if it really improves DMZ security like option B suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
6 months ago
I remember studying about DMZs and their role in network security, but I'm not sure if option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
6 months ago
This one seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident the answer is True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
6 months ago
I think the key here is that the marketing team needs to be able to manage the site, so I'm leaning towards either Force.com Sites or Site.com.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
6 months ago
I'm worried that I might miscalculate the cash consideration effects on the new value. I hope I can remember the right formula!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel