Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 CISSP Exam - Topic 1 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CISSP exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 1
[All CISSP Questions]

Which of the following types of datacenter architectures will MOST likely be used in a large SDN and can be extended beyond the datacenter?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Shala at Jun 21, 2024, 05:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISSP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Renea
4 months ago
Wait, can spine and leaf really extend beyond the datacenter?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
5 months ago
Three-tiered networks are outdated, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
5 months ago
I thought FCoE was more common in large setups?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
5 months ago
Definitely agree, it's the best for SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
5 months ago
Spine and leaf is super scalable!
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards spine and leaf too, but I wonder if top-of-rack switching could also be a contender in some scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hershel
6 months ago
I feel like iSCSI and FCoE are more about storage than the actual network architecture, so they might not be the right answers here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
6 months ago
I remember practicing a question about datacenter architectures, and I think the three-tiered network was mentioned as a traditional setup, but it might not be the best for SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
6 months ago
I think the spine and leaf architecture is the one that can scale well with SDN, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most common choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
6 months ago
The spine and leaf architecture seems like the obvious choice here. It's optimized for SDN and can scale beyond the datacenter, which is exactly what the question is asking about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to review my notes on datacenter architectures to make sure I understand the differences between them before answering this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dan
6 months ago
The spine and leaf architecture sounds like the most promising choice to me. It's specifically designed for large-scale SDN environments, which seems to fit the requirements of the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The question is asking about the most likely architecture, so I'll have to think carefully about the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
6 months ago
I think the spine and leaf architecture would be the best choice here, since it's designed for large-scale SDN deployments and can be extended beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The Init state is where the process starts, the Set Transaction State sets the current transaction status, the Get transaction data state retrieves the data, the Process Transaction State handles the actual processing, and the End Process State wraps things up. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
6 months ago
I'm not totally sure, but I think Social Cognitive Theory focuses more on observational learning than intention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
11 months ago
Hmm, I'd say D) Spine and leaf is the way to go. It's like a giant game of Tetris, but with networking components instead of blocks.
upvoted 0 times
Anna
10 months ago
User 3: Top-of-rack switching is also a good option for extending beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
10 months ago
User 2: I think C) Three-tiered network could also work well, but D) Spine and leaf is more scalable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
10 months ago
User 1: I agree, D) Spine and leaf architecture is definitely the best choice for large SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracie
11 months ago
Ooh, D) Spine and leaf, for sure! It's like a futuristic city grid, with the spines as the main avenues and the leaves as the side streets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keva
11 months ago
D) Spine and leaf is the answer, no doubt about it. It's like a well-choreographed dance, with the spines and leaves moving in perfect harmony.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wynell
11 months ago
Aha! The spine and leaf architecture is like the backbone of a giraffe - strong and adaptable. Definitely the way to go for a large SDN.
upvoted 0 times
Nina
10 months ago
True, but spine and leaf is more commonly used for large SDNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
10 months ago
I agree, spine and leaf architecture can be extended beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
10 months ago
It's like the backbone of a giraffe - strong and adaptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
10 months ago
I think top-of-rack switching could also be a good option for extending beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
10 months ago
It's like the backbone of a giraffe - strong and adaptable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
10 months ago
Spine and leaf architecture is definitely the way to go for a large SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
10 months ago
I agree, the spine and leaf architecture is definitely the way to go for a large SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Clement
12 months ago
D) Spine and leaf seems like the most scalable and flexible option for a large SDN that extends beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
Paz
10 months ago
E) Top-of-rack switching is more suitable for smaller scale deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
10 months ago
C) Three-tiered network may not provide the scalability needed for a large SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
11 months ago
A) iSCSI is not typically used for large SDN deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
11 months ago
D) Spine and leaf seems like the most scalable and flexible option for a large SDN that extends beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
12 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Three-tiered network could also be a good option for a large SDN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
1 year ago
I agree with Torie, Spine and leaf architecture is scalable and can be extended beyond the datacenter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Spine and leaf.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel