MENU
Which of the following types of datacenter architectures will MOST likely be used in a large SDN and can be extended beyond the datacenter?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CISSP Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
RE
Renea
10 months ago
Wait, can spine and leaf really extend beyond the datacenter?
EL
Ellsworth
11 months ago
Three-tiered networks are outdated, right?
PI
Pilar
11 months ago
I thought FCoE was more common in large setups?
CO
Corazon
11 months ago
Definitely agree, it's the best for SDN.
RE
Reuben
11 months ago
Spine and leaf is super scalable!
TI
Titus
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards spine and leaf too, but I wonder if top-of-rack switching could also be a contender in some scenarios.
HE
Hershel
12 months ago
I feel like iSCSI and FCoE are more about storage than the actual network architecture, so they might not be the right answers here.
CH
Chau
12 months ago
I remember practicing a question about datacenter architectures, and I think the three-tiered network was mentioned as a traditional setup, but it might not be the best for SDN.
KA
Karl
1 year ago
I think the spine and leaf architecture is the one that can scale well with SDN, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most common choice.
ED
Eden
1 year ago
The spine and leaf architecture seems like the obvious choice here. It's optimized for SDN and can scale beyond the datacenter, which is exactly what the question is asking about.
RO
Ronnie
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll need to review my notes on datacenter architectures to make sure I understand the differences between them before answering this.
DA
Dan
1 year ago
The spine and leaf architecture sounds like the most promising choice to me. It's specifically designed for large-scale SDN environments, which seems to fit the requirements of the question.
SA
Salina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The question is asking about the most likely architecture, so I'll have to think carefully about the pros and cons of each option.
GR
Grover
1 year ago
I think the spine and leaf architecture would be the best choice here, since it's designed for large-scale SDN deployments and can be extended beyond the datacenter.
AR
Arminda
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The Init state is where the process starts, the Set Transaction State sets the current transaction status, the Get transaction data state retrieves the data, the Process Transaction State handles the actual processing, and the End Process State wraps things up. I'm feeling confident about this one.
LO
Louann
1 year ago
I'm not totally sure, but I think Social Cognitive Theory focuses more on observational learning than intention.
SH
Sherita
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say D) Spine and leaf is the way to go. It's like a giant game of Tetris, but with networking components instead of blocks.
AN
Anna
1 year ago
User 3: Top-of-rack switching is also a good option for extending beyond the datacenter.
GE
Gearldine
1 year ago
User 2: I think C) Three-tiered network could also work well, but D) Spine and leaf is more scalable.
CU
Curt
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, D) Spine and leaf architecture is definitely the best choice for large SDN.
GR
Gracie
1 year ago
Ooh, D) Spine and leaf, for sure! It's like a futuristic city grid, with the spines as the main avenues and the leaves as the side streets.
KE
Keva
1 year ago
D) Spine and leaf is the answer, no doubt about it. It's like a well-choreographed dance, with the spines and leaves moving in perfect harmony.
WY
Wynell
1 year ago
Aha! The spine and leaf architecture is like the backbone of a giraffe - strong and adaptable. Definitely the way to go for a large SDN.
NI
Nina
1 year ago
True, but spine and leaf is more commonly used for large SDNs.
KE
Keneth
1 year ago
I agree, spine and leaf architecture can be extended beyond the datacenter.
LO
Louisa
1 year ago
It's like the backbone of a giraffe - strong and adaptable.
LA
Laquanda
1 year ago
I think top-of-rack switching could also be a good option for extending beyond the datacenter.
MA
Mari
1 year ago
It's like the backbone of a giraffe - strong and adaptable.
CO
Corrina
1 year ago
Spine and leaf architecture is definitely the way to go for a large SDN.
WE
Wei
1 year ago
I agree, the spine and leaf architecture is definitely the way to go for a large SDN.
CL
Clement
1 year ago
D) Spine and leaf seems like the most scalable and flexible option for a large SDN that extends beyond the datacenter.
PA
Paz
1 year ago
E) Top-of-rack switching is more suitable for smaller scale deployments.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
C) Three-tiered network may not provide the scalability needed for a large SDN.
EL
Eleonora
1 year ago
A) iSCSI is not typically used for large SDN deployments.
CH
Cheryll
1 year ago
D) Spine and leaf seems like the most scalable and flexible option for a large SDN that extends beyond the datacenter.
CA
Carey
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Three-tiered network could also be a good option for a large SDN.
MY
Myrtie
2 years ago
I agree with Torie, Spine and leaf architecture is scalable and can be extended beyond the datacenter.
TO
Torie
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Spine and leaf.