Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISC2 CAP Exam - Topic 5 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISC2's CAP exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 5
[All CAP Questions]

In 2003, NIST developed a new Certification & Accreditation (C&A) guideline known as FIPS 199. What levels of potential impact are defined by FIPS 199?

Each correct answer represents a complete solution. Choose all that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C, D

by Shawna at Jul 25, 2022, 04:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rory
5 months ago
I thought there were more levels than just those three.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
5 months ago
Yup, Low, Moderate, and High are spot on!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
6 months ago
Wait, is Medium even a thing in FIPS 199?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
6 months ago
Definitely agree, those are the right levels!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
6 months ago
FIPS 199 defines Low, Moderate, and High impact levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
6 months ago
I’m pretty confident about Low, Moderate, and High being the right choices. Those were emphasized in our study materials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
6 months ago
I think the correct answers are definitely Low, Moderate, and High. I practiced a similar question last week.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
6 months ago
I remember FIPS 199 defining three levels of impact, but I'm not sure if "Medium" is one of them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordie
6 months ago
I feel like "Medium" might be a trick option. I just can't recall if it was officially mentioned in the guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the details of non-qualified plans. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I don't mix up the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
6 months ago
Okay, I think I know the answer to this. It's got to be Normalization to the Splunk Common Information Model, right?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel