Free ISC2 CISSP Exam Dumps July 2026

The most critical factor to achieve the goals of a security program is the executive management support. The executive management is the highest level of authority or decision-making in the organization, such as the board of directors, the chief executive officer, or the chief information officer. The executive management support is the endorsement, the sponsorship, or the involvement of the executive management in the security program, such as the security planning, the security implementation, the security monitoring, or the security auditing. The executive management support is the most critical factor to achieve the goals of the security program, as it can provide the vision, the direction, or the strategy for the security program, and it can align the security program with the business needs and requirements. The executive management support can also provide the resources, the budget, or the authority for the security program, and it can foster the security culture, the security awareness, or the security governance in the organization. The executive management support can also influence the stakeholders, the customers, or the regulators, and it can demonstrate the commitment, the accountability, or the responsibility for the security program. Capabilities of security resources, effectiveness of security management, and budget approved for security resources are not the most critical factors to achieve the goals of the security program, as they are related to the skills, the performance, or the funding of the security program, not the endorsement, the sponsorship, or the involvement of the executive management in the security program.Reference:CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 1, Security and Risk Management, page 33.Official (ISC)2 CISSP CBK Reference, Fifth Edition, Chapter 1, Security and Risk Management, page 48.

Security portfolio management is the process of identifying, classifying, and managing the data assets of an organization, as well as assigning ownership responsibilities and defining protection requirements. Security portfolio management entails identification of data and links to business processes, applications, and data stores, as well as assessment of data value, sensitivity, and risk. Security portfolio management can help an organization achieve data security, compliance, and governance objectives. Reference: CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 2: Asset Security, page 69; [Official (ISC)2 CISSP CBK Reference, Fifth Edition, Chapter 2: Asset Security, page 131]

An attack utilizing social engineering and a malicious Uniform Resource Locator (URL) link to take advantage of a victim's existing browser session with a web application is an example of a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. A CSRF attack is a type of web-based attack that exploits the trust between a web browser and a web server, by tricking the victim into performing an unwanted action on a web application that the victim is already authenticated or authorized to use. For example, a CSRF attack can make the victim transfer funds, change passwords, or delete accounts on a web application, without the victim's knowledge or consent. A CSRF attack typically involves the following steps: The attacker crafts a malicious URL or HTML code that contains a forged request to a web application that the victim is likely to use, such as a banking, shopping, or social media site. The attacker delivers the malicious URL or HTML code to the victim, using social engineering techniques, such as phishing emails, instant messages, or web pages. The victim clicks on the malicious URL or HTML code, which is executed by the victim's web browser. The victim's web browser sends the forged request to the web application, along with the victim's session cookie or token, which authenticates or authorizes the victim to the web application. The web application receives the forged request and executes it, as if it was initiated by the victim. The web application performs the unwanted action, such as transferring funds, changing passwords, or deleting accounts, on behalf of the victim. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Injection, and Click jacking are not types of attacks that utilize social engineering and a malicious URL link to take advantage of a victim's existing browser session with a web application. XSS is a type of web-based attack that exploits the vulnerability of a web application, by injecting malicious scripts into the web pages that are viewed by other users. Injection is a type of web-based attack that exploits the vulnerability of a web application, by injecting malicious commands or queries into the user input, such as forms, fields, or URLs. Click jacking is a type of web-based attack that exploits the vulnerability of a web browser, by overlaying a transparent or hidden layer on top of a legitimate web page, and tricking the user into clicking on the hidden layer, which performs an unwanted action on the underlying web page.Reference:Official (ISC)2 CISSP CBK Reference, Fifth Edition, Domain 6, Security Assessment and Testing, page 605.CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 6, Security Assessment and Testing, page 559.

The individuals who are ultimately responsible to ensure that information assets are categorized and adequate measures are taken to protect them are the data/information/business owners. Data/information/business owners are the individuals who have the authority or accountability for the information assets of an organization, such as data, systems, or processes. Data/information/business owners are ultimately responsible to ensure that information assets are categorized and adequate measures are taken to protect them, which means that they have to define and implement the rules and guidelines for classifying and securing the information assets according to their sensitivity, value, or criticality. Data/information/business owners also have to assign and oversee the roles and responsibilities of the data custodians and users, who are the individuals who have the duty or privilege to maintain or access the information assets of the organization. The other options are not the individuals who are ultimately responsible to ensure that information assets are categorized and adequate measures are taken to protect them, but rather different or subordinate roles. A data custodian is an individual who has the duty to maintain or safeguard the information assets of an organization, such as backup, restore, or encryption. A data custodian is responsible to follow the instructions or directions of the data/information/business owner, but not to make the decisions or policies for the information assets. Executive management is the group of individuals who have the highest level of authority or leadership in an organization, such as board of directors, chief executive officer, or chief financial officer. Executive management is responsible to provide the support or approval for the information security strategy, policies, and programs of the organization, but not to directly manage or control the information assets. A chief information security officer is an individual who has the senior executive responsibility for overseeing and managing the information security strategy, policies, and programs of an organization. A chief information security officer is responsible to advise and assist the data/information/business owners, executive management, and other stakeholders on the information security matters, but not to own or operate the information assets.Reference:CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Eighth Edition, Chapter 1, p. 28;Official (ISC)2 CISSP CBK Reference, Fifth Edition, Chapter 5, p. 286.

The primary objective of the post-incident phase of the incident response process in the security operations center (SOC) is to improve the IR process. The incident response (IR) process is a set of activities that aims to detect, contain, analyze, eradicate, and recover from security incidents, and to prevent or minimize the impact and damage of the incidents. The IR process consists of six phases: preparation, identification, containment, analysis, eradication, and recovery. The post-incident phase is the last phase of the IR process, and it focuses on learning from the incident and improving the IR process for the future. The post-incident phase involves tasks such as:

Reviewing and documenting the incident, including the cause, impact, response, and lessons learned

Evaluating and updating the IR plan, policies, procedures, and tools, based on the feedback and recommendations from the incident

Conducting a post-incident review or debriefing with the IR team and the stakeholders, to share the findings, results, and best practices from the incident

Implementing the corrective and preventive actions, such as patching the vulnerabilities, restoring the systems, or enhancing the security controls, to prevent or mitigate the recurrence of the incident

Providing the training and awareness, such as conducting the exercises, simulations, or workshops, to improve the skills and knowledge of the IR team and the organization The other options are not the primary objective of the post-incident phase of the IR process in the SOC, as they either belong to other phases of the IR process, or are not the main focus of the post-incident phase.Reference:CISSP - Certified Information Systems Security Professional, Domain 7. Security Operations, 7.3 Understand and support forensic investigations, 7.3.2 Conduct incident response, 7.3.2.1 Incident handling;CISSP Exam Outline, Domain 7. Security Operations, 7.3 Understand and support forensic investigations, 7.3.2 Conduct incident response, 7.3.2.1 Incident handling

The organization will provide the limits and scope of the testing to the security services firm that will conduct a penetration test. The limits and scope of the testing define the boundaries, objectives, and rules of engagement for the penetration test, such as the target systems, the testing methods, the testing duration, the testing schedule, the testing team, the testing tools, the testing reporting, and the testing authorization. The limits and scope of the testing are essential for ensuring the legality, the ethics, and the effectiveness of the penetration test.

B . Physical location of server room and wiring closet is not something that the organization will provide to the security services firm that will conduct a penetration test, as it could compromise the security and the integrity of the network infrastructure and the testing results.

C . Logical location of filters and concentrators is not something that the organization will provide to the security services firm that will conduct a penetration test, as it could reveal the network architecture and the security controls and affect the testing accuracy and validity.

D . Employee directory and organizational chart is not something that the organization will provide to the security services firm that will conduct a penetration test, as it could violate the privacy and the confidentiality of the employees and the organization.