New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca COBIT5 Exam - Topic 7 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT5 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 7
[All COBIT5 Questions]

When tailoring the COBIT organization structure to organizational context and priorities, which of the following

should be done NEXT after mapping organizational structures with specific responsibility or accountability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Azalee
4 months ago
Agreed, B is the way to go for clarity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
4 months ago
C seems a bit excessive, do we really need two more levels?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
I think A makes more sense, job descriptions are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
5 months ago
Definitely B, adapting roles is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
5 months ago
I recall that adapting the COBIT roles is crucial, but I wonder if revising job descriptions might also be necessary to clarify responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like adding levels of involvement is more about communication than structure. So, I'm leaning towards adapting the roles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about revising job descriptions being important. It could be a possible next step too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
5 months ago
I think after mapping the structures, we might need to adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures. That seems to fit best with the next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is asking how to ensure end-to-end encryption, and the answer is clearly to enable the SSL profile for the listener. That's the best way to maintain the encryption all the way through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Provisioning AVR, which is option A, seems like the logical first step an LTM Specialist would take to start utilizing this feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Correcting the namespace prefixes in lines 5 and 8 should be the key changes to make this Assign1 activity work with the current variable values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
5 months ago
I think D might be tricky because low prices usually increase demand, but I'm not sure about the suppliers' willingness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of management changes being made on the primary ADC to avoid issues. Wasn't it something about a Cluster IP address?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel