Which of the following components is important to update in a COBIT RACI chart to align with the enterprise's context, priorities and preferred terminology?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium COBIT5 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
MO
Monte
11 months ago
Totally with you on A, it makes the most sense!
AB
Abel
12 months ago
Wait, are we really updating roles that often? Seems excessive.
WA
Wayne
12 months ago
C is important too, but A feels like the top priority.
AN
Andree
12 months ago
I think B is more crucial for alignment.
AL
Alberta
1 year ago
Definitely A, roles change all the time!
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
I feel like it could be B since updating processes might reflect changes in priorities, but I’m not confident.
EL
Elliot
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought procedures and job descriptions were also key to alignment. Could it be C?
SH
Shelia
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed the importance of aligning roles with the enterprise context, so I’m leaning towards A as well.
CE
Cecily
1 year ago
I think it might be A, but I'm not entirely sure if roles or processes are more critical to update.
EM
Emelda
1 year ago
Ugh, I'm really struggling with this one. The matching principle is tripping me up, and I can't quite remember how it applies here. I'll have to review my notes and try to work through this step-by-step.
PA
Paulina
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know bias has something to do with measurement accuracy, but I'm not confident that's the right answer. Maybe I should review my notes on measurement concepts before deciding.
HE
Herman
1 year ago
I think I've got this one. Based on my understanding of the Vulnerability Application, the approvals are likely created using the sn_vul_vulnerable_item and sn_vul_vulnerability tables.
DA
Daniela
1 year ago
I feel a bit confused about how to calculate the total costs for each product. Do we just multiply the cost driver rates by their respective quantities?