Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca COBIT5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

When can a process be rated as 'Largely achieved' for a particular attribute of that process?
C) There is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute of that process.
A) There is some evidence of some achievement of the attribute for that process.
B) There are no significant weaknesses related to the attribute of that process.
D) When all the process attributes of the five capability levels, rate an average score of process capability Level 2.

Isaca COBIT5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT5 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 4
[All COBIT5 Questions]

When can a process be rated as 'Largely achieved' for a particular attribute of that process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tiera at Jun 12, 2025, 09:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COBIT5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Nobuko
7 months ago
D sounds too strict, not all processes fit that mold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
7 months ago
Wait, can we really rate it as 'largely achieved' with just some evidence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
7 months ago
A seems too vague, not enough evidence there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
7 months ago
I think it's C, systematic approach is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
7 months ago
Definitely agree with B, no significant weaknesses matter!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alida
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that achieving an average score of Level 2 across attributes could be a factor, which makes me think of option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
8 months ago
I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it emphasized evidence of achievement. That might point to option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about no significant weaknesses being important. Could that be option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
8 months ago
I think 'Largely achieved' means there should be a systematic approach, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
9 months ago
This looks straightforward. Based on my understanding, option B seems to best describe the 'Largely achieved' criteria, with no significant weaknesses related to the process attribute. I'll go with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
9 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the options. I'll need to carefully analyze each one to determine which best fits the 'Largely achieved' criteria. Might be worth reviewing my notes on process capability assessment before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
9 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is that for 'Largely achieved', there needs to be evidence of a systematic approach to the process attribute, and no significant weaknesses. I'll select option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the nuances between them. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
9 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about process capability assessment. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about the key criteria for a 'Largely achieved' rating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
Option D is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? I mean, why would the process capability level matter for this particular question? I'm sticking with C as the most logical answer.
upvoted 0 times
Rhea
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option C is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
I think option A could also be a valid answer, as long as there is some evidence of achievement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
12 months ago
I agree, option C does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Earleen
1 year ago
I believe a process can be rated as 'Largely achieved' if there is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
1 year ago
I agree with Frank. As long as there is some evidence of achievement, it should be considered 'largely achieved'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer had a lot of fun coming up with these options. They really know how to make us think! I'm going with C, but I'm open to being wrong.
upvoted 0 times
Wai
12 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most logical choice out of all the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
12 months ago
User 1: I think C is the right answer too. It makes sense to have a systematic approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raylene
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the answer, but I think it's important to consider the context of the process and the specific requirements of the organization. 'Largely achieved' could mean different things in different scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
1 year ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. The question asks about when a process can be rated as 'Largely achieved', which implies a systematic approach to the attribute of that process.
upvoted 0 times
Willodean
11 months ago
C) There is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute of that process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
12 months ago
B) There are no significant weaknesses related to the attribute of that process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
A) There is some evidence of some achievement of the attribute for that process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frank
1 year ago
I think a process can be rated as 'Largely achieved' if there is some evidence of some achievement of the attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel