Isaca COBIT5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT5 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 4

[All COBIT5 Questions]

When can a process be rated as 'Largely achieved' for a particular attribute of that process?

AThere is some evidence of some achievement of the attribute for that process.

BThere are no significant weaknesses related to the attribute of that process.

CThere is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute of that process.

DWhen all the process attributes of the five capability levels, rate an average score of process capability Level 2.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Tiera at Jun 12, 2025, 09:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium COBIT5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Nobuko

2 months ago

D sounds too strict, not all processes fit that mold.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

2 months ago

Wait, can we really rate it as 'largely achieved' with just some evidence?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gail

2 months ago

A seems too vague, not enough evidence there.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queen

3 months ago

I think it's C, systematic approach is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karma

3 months ago

Definitely agree with B, no significant weaknesses matter!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alida

3 months ago

I vaguely recall that achieving an average score of Level 2 across attributes could be a factor, which makes me think of option D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

3 months ago

I feel like we practiced a question similar to this, and it emphasized evidence of achievement. That might point to option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodolfo

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about no significant weaknesses being important. Could that be option B?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

4 months ago

I think 'Largely achieved' means there should be a systematic approach, so maybe option C is correct?

upvoted 0 times

...

This looks straightforward. Based on my understanding, option B seems to best describe the 'Largely achieved' criteria, with no significant weaknesses related to the process attribute. I'll go with that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

4 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of the options. I'll need to carefully analyze each one to determine which best fits the 'Largely achieved' criteria. Might be worth reviewing my notes on process capability assessment before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

4 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is that for 'Largely achieved', there needs to be evidence of a systematic approach to the process attribute, and no significant weaknesses. I'll select option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elsa

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the nuances between them. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about process capability assessment. I'll need to carefully review the options and think about the key criteria for a 'Largely achieved' rating.

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

8 months ago

Option D is a bit of a stretch, don't you think? I mean, why would the process capability level matter for this particular question? I'm sticking with C as the most logical answer.

upvoted 0 times

Rhea

7 months ago

I see your point, but I still think option C is the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

7 months ago

I think option A could also be a valid answer, as long as there is some evidence of achievement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

7 months ago

I agree, option C does seem like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

8 months ago

I believe a process can be rated as 'Largely achieved' if there is evidence of a systematic approach to the attribute.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mendy

8 months ago

I agree with Frank. As long as there is some evidence of achievement, it should be considered 'largely achieved'.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

8 months ago

Haha, I bet the exam writer had a lot of fun coming up with these options. They really know how to make us think! I'm going with C, but I'm open to being wrong.

upvoted 0 times

Wai

7 months ago

User 2: Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most logical choice out of all the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

7 months ago

User 1: I think C is the right answer too. It makes sense to have a systematic approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

8 months ago

I'm not sure about the answer, but I think it's important to consider the context of the process and the specific requirements of the organization. 'Largely achieved' could mean different things in different scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

8 months ago

Option C seems to be the correct answer. The question asks about when a process can be rated as 'Largely achieved', which implies a systematic approach to the attribute of that process.

upvoted 0 times