Option A seems too simplistic to me. Requiring hot sites for any declared disaster doesn't necessarily mean the overall planning process is effective. I'm leaning more towards C or D as the best answer here.
I think the answer is B - maintaining chain of custody throughout the disaster recovery process. That demonstrates the organization is being thorough and careful in how they handle things during an incident.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm considering option D - having recovery time objectives (RTOs) shorter than recovery point objectives (RPOs). That seems like it would be a good sign of an effective plan, but I'm not totally sure.
I'm pretty confident this is a question about disaster recovery planning. I think the best indication of an effective process is option C - conducting post-incident reviews after each event. That shows the organization is learning and improving their plan.
Una
3 months agoElvera
3 months agoKeneth
3 months agoRonny
4 months agoAudra
4 months agoEleonore
4 months agoGeoffrey
4 months agoKerry
4 months agoAlyce
5 months agoLorean
5 months agoLaine
5 months agoLashon
5 months agoTimothy
5 months agoMatt
1 year agoVernice
1 year agoIsaac
1 year agoDeane
1 year agoLarue
1 year agoJess
1 year agoCorinne
1 year agoNovella
1 year agoPhyliss
1 year agoLucina
1 year agoBarrett
1 year agoTamie
1 year agoMauricio
1 year agoMaddie
1 year agoTamie
1 year agoClaudio
1 year agoEleonore
1 year agoGalen
1 year ago