Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca CISM Exam - Topic 4 Question 88 Discussion

Which of the following is the BEST indication of an effective disaster recovery planning process?
C) Post-incident reviews are conducted after each event.
A) Hot sites are required for any declared disaster.
B) Chain of custody is maintained throughout the disaster recovery process.
D) Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are shorter than recovery point objectives (RPOs).

Isaca CISM Exam - Topic 4 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CISM exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 4
[All CISM Questions]

Which of the following is the BEST indication of an effective disaster recovery planning process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Marci at Oct 19, 2024, 05:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Una
7 months ago
Totally agree, maintaining chain of custody is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
8 months ago
Wait, are hot sites really required for all disasters? Seems extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
8 months ago
Hot sites are definitely a must for serious disasters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
8 months ago
I think RTOs being shorter than RPOs is a bit misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
8 months ago
Post-incident reviews are super important!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
9 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think the focus was on continuous improvement, which points to C again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
9 months ago
I feel like maintaining the chain of custody is crucial, so B could be a strong contender too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about RTOs and RPOs being important. Maybe D is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
9 months ago
I think option C makes sense because post-incident reviews help identify what went wrong and how to improve.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
9 months ago
Option A seems too simplistic to me. Requiring hot sites for any declared disaster doesn't necessarily mean the overall planning process is effective. I'm leaning more towards C or D as the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
9 months ago
I think the answer is B - maintaining chain of custody throughout the disaster recovery process. That demonstrates the organization is being thorough and careful in how they handle things during an incident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashon
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm considering option D - having recovery time objectives (RTOs) shorter than recovery point objectives (RPOs). That seems like it would be a good sign of an effective plan, but I'm not totally sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
9 months ago
I'm pretty confident this is a question about disaster recovery planning. I think the best indication of an effective process is option C - conducting post-incident reviews after each event. That shows the organization is learning and improving their plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
2 years ago
D is the way to go. Shorter RTOs than RPOs means the business can get up and running faster, which is the whole point of disaster recovery, right?
upvoted 0 times
Vernice
2 years ago
D is the way to go. Shorter RTOs than RPOs means the business can get up and running faster, which is the whole point of disaster recovery, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
2 years ago
D) Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are shorter than recovery point objectives (RPOs).
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
2 years ago
C) Post-incident reviews are conducted after each event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
2 years ago
B) Chain of custody is maintained throughout the disaster recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
2 years ago
A) Hot sites are required for any declared disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
2 years ago
Haha, option A is just ridiculous. Hot sites for every disaster? That's like having a spare house for every potential house fire!
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 years ago
I'd go with B. Maintaining chain of custody is essential for ensuring the integrity of data and systems during a disaster recovery scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Phyliss
2 years ago
C) Post-incident reviews are conducted after each event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 years ago
B) Chain of custody is maintained throughout the disaster recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 years ago
A) Hot sites are required for any declared disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
2 years ago
Option C seems like the most logical choice. Post-incident reviews are crucial for identifying areas for improvement in the disaster recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
Mauricio
2 years ago
C) Post-incident reviews are conducted after each event.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
2 years ago
D) Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are shorter than recovery point objectives (RPOs).
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
2 years ago
B) Chain of custody is maintained throughout the disaster recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
2 years ago
A) Hot sites are required for any declared disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eleonore
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's A) Hot sites are required for any declared disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
2 years ago
I think the best indication is C) Post-incident reviews are conducted after each event.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel