Option A seems too simplistic to me. Requiring hot sites for any declared disaster doesn't necessarily mean the overall planning process is effective. I'm leaning more towards C or D as the best answer here.
I think the answer is B - maintaining chain of custody throughout the disaster recovery process. That demonstrates the organization is being thorough and careful in how they handle things during an incident.
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm considering option D - having recovery time objectives (RTOs) shorter than recovery point objectives (RPOs). That seems like it would be a good sign of an effective plan, but I'm not totally sure.
I'm pretty confident this is a question about disaster recovery planning. I think the best indication of an effective process is option C - conducting post-incident reviews after each event. That shows the organization is learning and improving their plan.
Una
6 months agoElvera
6 months agoKeneth
6 months agoRonny
7 months agoAudra
7 months agoEleonore
7 months agoGeoffrey
7 months agoKerry
7 months agoAlyce
8 months agoLorean
8 months agoLaine
8 months agoLashon
8 months agoTimothy
8 months agoMatt
2 years agoVernice
1 year agoIsaac
1 year agoDeane
1 year agoLarue
1 year agoJess
2 years agoCorinne
2 years agoNovella
2 years agoPhyliss
1 year agoLucina
2 years agoBarrett
2 years agoTamie
2 years agoMauricio
1 year agoMaddie
1 year agoTamie
2 years agoClaudio
2 years agoEleonore
2 years agoGalen
2 years ago