MENU
Which is the BEST method to evaluate the effectiveness of an alternate processing site when continuous uptime is required?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium CISM Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
11 comments · newest first
MA
Margart
11 months ago
Full interruption sounds risky, but might be necessary.
CL
Cletus
12 months ago
Wait, can parallel tests really ensure continuous uptime?
JA
Jame
12 months ago
Simulation tests are great for real-world scenarios!
MY
Myra
12 months ago
I disagree, tabletop tests can be effective too.
HE
Herminia
1 year ago
Full interruption tests are the most thorough.
AR
Arlene
1 year ago
I think the parallel test is the safest option, but I’m not completely sure if it’s the best for continuous uptime evaluation.
DA
Dannie
1 year ago
Simulation tests could be useful, but I feel like they might not capture all the real-world issues we could face.
HA
Hailey
1 year ago
I remember practicing with tabletop tests, but they seem more theoretical. I wonder if they really show how effective the alternate site is.
BE
Belen
1 year ago
I think the full interruption test is really risky, but it might give the most accurate results. Not sure if it's the best choice though.
SH
Sherita
1 year ago
I'm feeling a little lost on this one. I'll have to review my notes and try to piece this together.
LE
Leonora
1 year ago
No problem, I've got this. The valid IPv6 multicast address range is FF00::/8, so I just need to figure out which of these options falls within that range.