New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CISA Exam - Topic 8 Question 87 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Evangelina
3 months ago
More completions (C) doesn’t mean they actually learned anything!
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
3 months ago
Wait, how can we trust third-party tests?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
3 months ago
Employee satisfaction doesn’t really measure effectiveness, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
4 months ago
I think D is more telling of actual effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
4 months ago
A is definitely the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
4 months ago
Reduced unintentional violations seems like a solid indicator of effectiveness. If people are making fewer mistakes, that must mean the training is working!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
4 months ago
I think the number of employees completing the training is important, but it doesn't really tell us if they actually learned anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
4 months ago
I'm not sure if employee satisfaction is a good measure. Just because they like the training doesn't mean it's effective, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
5 months ago
I remember discussing how third-party social engineering tests can really show if employees are applying what they learned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident that option A is the right answer here. Measuring the real-world impact through social engineering tests is the most reliable way to assess the security awareness training program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I can see the argument for social engineering tests, but I'm not sure if that's the only way to judge effectiveness. Reduced unintentional violations could also be a good indicator, no?
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Seeing how employees respond to real-world social engineering attempts seems like the most direct way to measure the training's impact. The other choices don't seem as relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marisha
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if employee satisfaction or just completing the training would really indicate effectiveness. I think the results of social engineering tests would be the best way to see if the training is actually working.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D about asking them why they're arguing and suggesting alternatives seems like it could be a good approach too. I'll have to think about the pros and cons of each choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 year ago
You know, I heard the security team had to bribe the employees with free donuts to get them to actually show up for the training. So I'm not sure option C is the best indicator.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
1 year ago
D) Reduced unintentional violations
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
B) Employee satisfaction with training
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
1 year ago
A) Results of third-party social engineering tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sommer
1 year ago
Increased number of employees completing the training? Sounds like a participation trophy to me. I want to see actual results, not just attendance records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
1 year ago
Employee satisfaction is important, but it doesn't necessarily mean the training is effective. I'd say option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
1 year ago
Hmm, I don't know. Reduced unintentional violations seems like a good indicator to me. It's all about the real-world impact, isn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Tina
1 year ago
Results of third-party social engineering tests would show real-world impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
1 year ago
Employee satisfaction with training could also be important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
Reduced unintentional violations is a good indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casandra
1 year ago
But wouldn't D) Reduced unintentional violations show that the training is actually being applied?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe C) Increased number of employees completing training is a better indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
1 year ago
I'd go with option A. Third-party social engineering tests are the most objective way to measure the effectiveness of the training.
upvoted 0 times
Mindy
1 year ago
A) Results of third-party social engineering tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
1 year ago
That's a good point, fewer violations would show improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
1 year ago
D) Reduced unintentional violations
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
1 year ago
I agree, those tests provide an unbiased assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 year ago
A) Results of third-party social engineering tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casandra
1 year ago
I think the best indicator would be A) Results of third-party social engineering tests.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel