New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca CISA Exam - Topic 1 Question 109 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CISA exam
Question #: 109
Topic #: 1
[All CISA Questions]

An IS auditor has been asked to review the quality of data in a general ledger system. Which of the following would provide the auditor with the MOST meaningful results?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jacob at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CISA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Joaquin
3 days ago
I'd go with B as well. Verifying the data against the original source is crucial for a meaningful audit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
8 days ago
Definitely B. Checking the source data is key to ensuring the integrity of the general ledger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
13 days ago
B) Integrity checks against source documentation seems like the most logical approach to assess data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
18 days ago
I feel like discussing account values could be helpful, but it might not give a complete picture of data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
24 days ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option B is definitely the best choice for meaningful results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
29 days ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think interviews could provide insights into how the system is used, which might help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 month ago
I remember discussing the importance of integrity checks in class. They seem crucial for ensuring data accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 month ago
I feel pretty confident that option B is the way to go here. Checking the integrity of the source data is key to evaluating the quality of the general ledger system. The other options just don't seem as directly relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 month ago
Option A seems a bit too high-level to me. Discussing the largest account values with business owners doesn't really get at the core issue of data quality. I think I'll go with option B or D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option D - interviews with system owners and operators. That could provide really valuable context and insights that the other options might miss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
2 months ago
I'm a bit unsure on this one. The question is asking for the "most meaningful results", so I'm not sure if the vulnerability assessment in option C might be more relevant. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 months ago
I think the best approach here would be to go with option B - integrity checks against source documentation. That seems like the most direct way to assess the quality of the data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel