Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca AAISM Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Posted by Casie on May 30, 2026 at 02:32 AM

An organization deploying an LLM is concerned input manipulations could compromise security. What is the MOST effective way to determine an acceptable risk threshold?

Suggested Answer: C

AAISM instructs that acceptable risk thresholds must be determined using business impact analysis. This aligns with the broader enterprise risk management principle of defining tolerances based on:

* potential harm

* regulatory exposure

* financial impact

* operational disruption

Monitoring (A) detects attacks but does not set thresholds. Blocking special characters (B) is unrealistic and overly restrictive. Static thresholds (D) ignore business context and practicality.


============================================

Get Premium AAISM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
17 comments · newest first
VI
Virgina 23 days ago
I lean towards A. Continuous monitoring is key for security.
FR
Frederica 28 days ago
D seems too limiting. We need to allow diverse outputs.
LA
Lashawnda 1 month ago
True, but C helps balance security and functionality.
WI
Willow 1 month ago
I feel like B is too restrictive. We need flexibility in inputs.
ME
Merilyn 1 month ago
A is good too, but C gives a broader view of risks.
VE
Veronika 2 months ago
But what about A? Real-time monitoring could catch issues early.
DO
Dorethea 2 months ago
I agree, C makes sense. It helps prioritize risks.
LE
Leanna 2 months ago
I think option C is the best. Understanding business impact is crucial.
EL
Elvera 2 months ago
D sounds too limiting, we need flexibility!
DI
Diego 2 months ago
A and C together would be ideal, but C is key.
SH
Shantay 2 months ago
Wait, can special characters really be that risky?
AV
Avery 3 months ago
I disagree, A seems more proactive for security.
SH
Shawnda 3 months ago
C is the way to go, gotta know the impact first!
SA
Santos 3 months ago
Implementing a static threshold for LLM outputs could be risky too, since it might not adapt to new threats effectively.
DE
Deja 3 months ago
Restricting inputs with special characters seems too limiting; I feel like it could hinder functionality more than it helps.
ER
Erick 3 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed real-time logging and monitoring, but I wonder if that alone is enough to set a risk threshold.
SH
Shasta 4 months ago
I think assessing the business impact of known threats might be the best option, but I'm not entirely sure if it covers all scenarios.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel