Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca AAIR Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

A risk practitioner assesses a new AI system and determines that the risk is within the organization's risk tolerance. Which of the following is the BEST recommendation to ensure system controls remain effective over time?
C) Continuous monitoring for data and performance drift
A) Alignment with recognized AI control frameworks
B) Ongoing AI security and risk awareness training
D) Periodic regulatory compliance reviews

Isaca AAIR Exam - Topic 1 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's AAIR exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 1
[All AAIR Questions]

A risk practitioner assesses a new AI system and determines that the risk is within the organization's risk tolerance. Which of the following is the BEST recommendation to ensure system controls remain effective over time?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Even when an AI system is initially assessed as within risk tolerance, its risk profile evolves as the system encounters new data, the operational environment changes, and model performance drifts. Controls that were effective at deployment may become insufficient as these changes accumulate.

Why C is Correct: The ISACA AAIR operational monitoring guidance identifies continuous monitoring for data and performance drift as the most important mechanism for maintaining control effectiveness over time. Drift detection provides early warning when the AI system begins behaving differently from its validated state---enabling timely control adjustments before risk tolerance is breached. This is particularly critical because AI systems can degrade gradually in ways not visible without active monitoring.

Why A is Wrong: Framework alignment establishes the control baseline but does not actively verify that controls remain effective as the system evolves. Frameworks provide structure; monitoring provides assurance.

Why B is Wrong: Security and risk awareness training is an important human capability development activity but does not detect technical changes in AI system behavior. Training does not substitute for technical monitoring.

Why D is Wrong: Periodic compliance reviews occur at scheduled intervals and may miss drift that develops between review cycles. Continuous monitoring provides real-time detection that periodic reviews cannot match.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Floyd
1 day ago
Not sure if monitoring alone is enough, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
6 days ago
Definitely alignment with frameworks is a must.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
11 days ago
Surprised that compliance reviews aren't the top choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
17 days ago
I think ongoing training is just as important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rose
22 days ago
Continuous monitoring is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
27 days ago
I feel like periodic regulatory compliance reviews are important, but they might not address the ongoing risks as effectively as continuous monitoring would.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 month ago
Continuous monitoring for data and performance drift seems like it would be the most effective way to ensure controls stay relevant over time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 month ago
I think alignment with recognized AI control frameworks is crucial, but I wonder if it’s enough on its own without ongoing training.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 month ago
I remember we discussed the importance of continuous monitoring in our last class, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel