Informatica Exam PR000007 Topic 2 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for Informatica's PR000007 exam

Question #: 85
Topic #: 2

You have coped a set of PowerCenter objects to a new folder, Many of the objects that now appear in the destination folder have a "1" appended to their names, such as 'Targetname1 instead of the expected Targetname.

How would you recommend avoiding this situation in the future"?

ADelete duplicate objects in the destination folder prior to copying.

BRename duplicate objects In the destination folder prior to copying.

CResolve duplicate conflicts with 'replace' or 'reuse.'

DResolve duplicate conflicts with 'rename' and manually provide an alternate name for the object.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Aretha at May 01, 2024, 07:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PR000007 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shawna

2 months ago

Option D all the way! Manually renaming the objects lets you keep an eye on what's going on and avoid any unintended consequences. Just don't forget to bring your crystal ball to predict all the potential object names. Because who knows what other surprises might be lurking in that folder, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

2 months ago

Personally, I'd choose option B. Renaming the duplicates in the destination folder before copying just seems like the cleanest approach. Plus, it gives you a chance to tidy things up a bit. Although, I bet the person who came up with this question has a real knack for making us overthink things.

upvoted 0 times

Vanesa

28 days ago

I personally prefer option A, it's a quick way to clean up any duplicates before copying.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

1 months ago

I see your point, but I think option C could also work well in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salome

1 months ago

I think I would go with option D, just to have more control over the naming process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

2 months ago

I agree, option B does seem like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shoshana

2 months ago

I'm feeling option C. 'Replace' or 'reuse' seems like the quickest way to deal with those duplicate conflicts. Though I do wonder if that might overwrite any important changes we've made to the objects. Decisions, decisions...

upvoted 0 times

Kindra

25 days ago

Maybe we should go with option D then, and manually rename the objects to avoid any conflicts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yesenia

1 months ago

But what if it overwrites important changes we've made?

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

1 months ago

I think option C is the best choice. It's quick and easy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

3 months ago

Hmm, I'd go with option D. Renaming the objects manually sounds like the best way to avoid the '1' appended names. Who wants a folder full of 'Targetname1' and 'Targetname2'? It's like a secret code that only the developer can decipher.

upvoted 0 times