Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Infoblox Exam NIOS-DDI-Expert Topic 6 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for Infoblox's NIOS-DDI-Expert exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 6
[All NIOS-DDI-Expert Questions]

In what scenario would you tick the "Allow Multiple Values" checkbox when creating an Extensible Attribute?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth

Extensible Attributes (EAs) in NIOS are custom metadata fields that administrators can define to tag objects like networks, hosts, or leases with additional information for reporting, filtering, or automation. By default, an EA holds a single value (e.g., 'Location: New York'), but ticking the 'Allow Multiple Values' checkbox enables the EA to store a list of values for a single object (e.g., 'Contacts: [Alice, Bob, Charlie]').

Scenario: Imagine a network object representing a data center with multiple administrators. Setting 'Admin Contacts' as an EA with 'Allow Multiple Values' lets you assign multiple names to that network, which is useful for tracking responsibilities.

Option Analysis:

A: Numeric ranges (e.g., '1-100') are handled by the EA's type (Integer) and validation rules, not multiple values. Incorrect.

B: Requiring a single value contradicts the purpose of 'Allow Multiple Values,' which enables flexibility. Incorrect.

C: Email addresses could use multiple values (e.g., multiple contacts), but this isn't the defining scenario---it's too specific. Incorrect.

D: This is the general, correct case: when an object needs multiple entries for the same EA, like multiple tags or contacts.

Practical Example: In a Grid troubleshooting scenario (INE focus), you might use an EA like 'Backup Servers' with multiple values to list all failover servers for a network, aiding in diagnostics.

The INE course emphasizes practical Grid management, including EA configuration for operational efficiency.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lavina
1 months ago
I think option B is also valid, as sometimes organizations may require only a single value for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
1 months ago
I'm a little confused by the question. Isn't the whole point of an Extensible Attribute to allow multiple values? I'd have to say D is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Novella
3 days ago
Jacquline: Definitely, it makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
16 days ago
User 3: So, we all think D is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquline
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It allows for multiple values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
1 months ago
User 1: I think D is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nadine
1 months ago
Haha, option C for email addresses? That's a good one. Clearly, D is the way to go if you want to allow multiple values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
1 months ago
I'd go with option D. Having the ability to store multiple values for an EA is super useful, especially for things like contact info or other metadata.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
1 months ago
I agree with Justine, it makes sense to allow multiple values if the object needs to store more than one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
2 months ago
I would choose option D, when an object should be able to store multiple values for this EA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
2 months ago
D seems like the obvious choice here. Why would you want to restrict an Extensible Attribute to a single value? Allowing multiple values just makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
Yeah, D seems like the most practical choice in most situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
24 hours ago
I see your point, but I still think D is the most common scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
2 days ago
I think C could also be a valid scenario, depending on the use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
3 days ago
I agree, D is the best option. It gives more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
7 days ago
Elenore: Exactly, it just makes the data management more efficient and versatile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gretchen
12 days ago
User 3: It can be really useful when you have multiple values that need to be associated with an object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
13 days ago
User 2: Definitely, it gives more flexibility in storing different values for the same attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, D is the best option for allowing multiple values for an Extensible Attribute.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel