Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IMANET Exam CMA Topic 2 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for IMANET's CMA exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 2
[All CMA Questions]

The data available for the current year are given below.

using the information presented above, the contribution by Division I was?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The NPV of both machines must be calculated and compared to determine which will yield a better return of cash flows. Machine A is calculated as one lump sum payable in 4 years minus the initial investment cost.

The NPV of Machine B is calculated as the present value of an ordinary annuity of

$13,000 for 4 years, minus the initial investment cost.

By comparing the NPV of both machines, Cliff would choose Machine A because NPV of A > NPV of B by $1,044.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Adolph
2 months ago
I'm going to have to double-check my work, but I think the answer is B) $260,000. That's my final answer... unless I change my mind again.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
30 days ago
Let's double-check the data to confirm the correct contribution amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 months ago
Are you sure about that? I calculated it to be $310,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 months ago
I agree, Division I's contribution was $260,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) $260,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Natalie
2 months ago
Honestly, I'm just going to guess. This exam is making me hungry. Is it lunchtime yet?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
2 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to go with D) $380,000. Gotta take a risk, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Mickie
1 months ago
User 3: I agree with User Comment, I also think it's D) $380,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
2 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure, but I'll go with B) $260,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
2 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is A) $190,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shayne
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards C) $310,000. It just seems more in line with the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
Shawn
1 months ago
I'm still sticking with C) $310,000. It just seems like the most likely option based on the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be D) $380,000. It could be a higher contribution from Division I.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
1 months ago
I agree with you, Division I's contribution does seem to align more with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
2 months ago
I think it's actually B) $260,000. Division I's contribution seems to match that amount.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twanna
3 months ago
I calculated it and I am confident that the contribution was $310,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the contribution was $190,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
3 months ago
I think the contribution by Division I was $260,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
3 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's B) $260,000. The data looks straightforward enough.
upvoted 0 times
Elvera
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards D) $380,000. Division I might have a bigger contribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) $310,000. The numbers are a bit confusing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
I agree with you, I also think it's A) $190,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
2 months ago
I think it's A) $190,000. Division I's contribution seems lower.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I agree with you, it seems like the correct answer is B) $260,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 months ago
I think it's A) $190,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel