Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IMANET CMA Exam - Topic 1 Question 103 Discussion

Posted by Marge on Nov 16, 2024 at 12:07 AM

Barker, Inc. has no capital rationing constraint and is analyzing many independent investment alternatives. Barker should accept all investment proposals

Suggested Answer: D

Initially, the company must invest $105,000 in the machine. Consisting of the invoice price of $90 00. the delivery costs of $6,000, and the installation costs of $9,000.


Get Premium CMA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
MA
Magnolia 10 months ago
Surprised they can take all proposals without limits!
WI
Winifred 11 months ago
Only if they exceed the cost of debt, right?
DA
Dalene 11 months ago
Wait, what if the risks are too high?
EL
Eliseo 11 months ago
I agree, NPV is key!
AN
Annelle 11 months ago
Definitely should accept those with positive cash flows!
WH
Whitley 12 months ago
I’m a bit confused because I thought having positive cash flows was enough, but now I’m questioning if NPV is the key factor here.
JA
Janessa 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the answer was based on NPV, so I’m leaning towards option D.
FL
Florencia 12 months ago
I feel like the focus should be on the cash flows, but I also recall something about the cost of debt being important.
SH
Shawnda 1 year ago
I think I remember that we should accept projects with a positive net present value, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only criterion.
BA
Bambi 1 year ago
Wait, I'm not sure. What if Barker has limited debt financing available? Wouldn't option A be relevant in that case? I'll need to re-read the question and consider all the possibilities.
MA
Marla 1 year ago
Okay, I've got it. The key here is that Barker has no capital rationing constraint, so they can accept all positive NPV projects. The other options are just distractors. I'm confident D is the right answer.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Is it really that simple? What about the other options - do they have any merit? I'll need to think this through carefully.
HA
Halina 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think the answer is D - Barker should accept all investment proposals that have a positive net present value.
JE
Jesse 1 year ago
Wait, Barker has no capital rationing constraint? Lucky them! I wish my company had that luxury. Option D all the way!
CE
Celestina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesse
Debt financing availability is also important, so option A is something to consider.
DO
Domitila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesse
I agree, as long as the investment has a positive net present value, Barker should accept it.
ST
Staci 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jesse
Yes, Barker is in a good position without capital rationing. Option D makes sense.
HU
Huey 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I think option A makes the most sense. Barker should accept all investment proposals if they have access to debt financing, right?
KA
Katlyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Huey
User 3: Yes, that way Barker can maximize their potential returns on investments.
AL
Alana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Huey
User 2: I agree. It would make sense to take advantage of debt financing for investment opportunities.
AN
Angella 1 year ago
↳ replying to Huey
User 1: I think option A is a good choice. If debt financing is available, Barker should accept all investment proposals.
LE
Leonor 1 year ago
Haha, who needs a cost of debt when you can just borrow money from your rich uncle at 0% interest? Option C is clearly the way to go!
DA
Dana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leonor
User 4: As long as the investment has a positive net present value, it's a good choice for Barker.
RI
Rickie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leonor
User 3: Option C all the way, positive cash flows are key for Barker, Inc.
AL
Alberto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leonor
User 2: Definitely, as long as the investment provides returns greater than the cost of debt.
TA
Tamra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Leonor
User 1: I agree, borrowing money at 0% interest is the best option.
JI
Jina 1 year ago
I disagree. I believe option B is the way to go. Barker should accept all investment proposals that have positive cash flows, regardless of their net present value.
WI
Wilburn 1 year ago
But what about the ones that provide returns greater than the before-tax cost of debt?
SH
Shaquana 2 years ago
I think option D is the correct answer. Barker should accept all investment proposals that have a positive net present value, as this will maximize the company's value.
DE
Deonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
True, but ultimately option D is the most comprehensive criteria to ensure the investments will be profitable for Barker, Inc.
AN
Annice 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
That's a good point. It's important for Barker to consider the cost of debt when making investment decisions.
DO
Donte 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
D) That have a positive net present value.
AD
Adrianna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
But what about option C? Shouldn't Barker also consider investments that provide returns greater than the before-tax cost of debt?
LO
Lou 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
A) If debt financing is available for them.
MI
Mila 1 year ago
↳ replying to Shaquana
I agree, option D makes the most sense. It ensures that the investments will generate more value than they cost.
AN
Annett 2 years ago
I agree with you, as long as they have positive cash flows.
TR
Trinidad 2 years ago
I think Barker should accept all investment proposals.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel