Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IISFA II0-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 127 Discussion

A forensically safe file viewer can cross not only application but OS boundaries, and they offer the added benefit that:
A) They don't tamper with the data in any way. Opening a Word file in a viewer usually changes nothing, for instance, but opening it in Word can change the modification date and other Properties-style information.
B) They don't tamper with the data in any way however they can change the modification date and other Properties-style information.
C) Opening a Word file in a viewer can change the modification date and other Properties-style information. When opening the same file in Word usually changes nothing.
D) They will tamper with the data in a subtle way.

IISFA II0-001 Exam - Topic 4 Question 127 Discussion

Actual exam question for IISFA's II0-001 exam
Question #: 127
Topic #: 4
[All II0-001 Questions]

A forensically safe file viewer can cross not only application but OS boundaries, and they offer the added benefit that:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Corinne at May 30, 2026, 02:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium II0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Aleisha
16 days ago
A is straightforward. Trustworthy file handling is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lachelle
21 days ago
C is confusing. It mixes up the viewer and Word behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
26 days ago
D is wrong. We need to preserve data, not tamper with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 month ago
I feel like A is clearer. No risk of altering files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 month ago
B is tricky. It says they don't tamper but can change dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
1 month ago
A makes sense. No changes mean reliable evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
Agreed! Forensic integrity is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
I think A is the best choice. It keeps the data intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
2 months ago
Definitely agree, forensics is all about preserving the original data!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
2 months ago
I thought all viewers were safe, but now I'm not so sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 months ago
Wait, are you saying some viewers can change modification dates? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
2 months ago
I disagree, I've seen some viewers mess with metadata.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
3 months ago
A forensically safe viewer keeps the data intact, that's a big plus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
3 months ago
I feel like D is definitely wrong since forensically safe viewers are supposed to avoid tampering, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omer
3 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think it was about how different applications handle file metadata. A seems to align with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think B might be tricky because it says they don't tamper with data but then mentions changing properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
3 months ago
I remember discussing how forensically safe viewers should preserve the original file properties, so I think A makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel