Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA Exam CBDA Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBDA exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 4
[All CBDA Questions]

A job satisfaction study is being considered. Half of the employees of the company will be interviewed by senior managers and the other half of the employees will be interviewed by an external market research company, using the same set of questions. Which of the following might be a concern for using this approach to collect study data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Summary statistics are numerical measures that describe certain characteristics of a data set, such as the mean, median, mode, standard deviation, range, or quartiles. Summary statistics can help simplify and communicate complex data, but they can also obscure or distort important information, such as the distribution, shape, outliers, or trends of the data. Contextualization is the process of providing relevant background information, assumptions, limitations, or explanations for the data analysis and its results. Contextualization can help avoid misinterpretation, confusion, or bias when using summary statistics. Contextualization can also help connect the data analysis to the business problem, objectives, and stakeholders.


by Josefa at Jul 05, 2024, 10:35 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBDA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Emogene
17 days ago
While the other options are important, reliability is the clear winner here. This approach sounds like a recipe for a data smoothie, with each interviewer adding their own 'special' ingredient.
upvoted 0 times
Christene
3 days ago
A: I agree, reliability is crucial in this situation. We need consistent results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martha
1 months ago
This is a classic case of 'too many cooks in the kitchen'. I bet the data will be a hot mess, like trying to herd cats with two different leashes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
1 months ago
I agree, the reliability of the data is at risk. Senior managers and external researchers may have different ways of conducting the interviews and interpreting the answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
2 months ago
But wouldn't validity also be affected by the different interviewers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
2 months ago
Reliability is definitely the key concern here. Having two different sets of interviewers, even with the same questions, could introduce bias and inconsistency in the responses.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
15 days ago
B: That's true, it could affect the overall accuracy of the study results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
20 days ago
A: It might be hard to compare the data collected if there are inconsistencies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
26 days ago
B: Yes, having senior managers and external researchers could lead to varied responses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
1 months ago
B: Yeah, having consistency in data collection is crucial for accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 months ago
A: I agree, reliability is a major concern when using different interviewers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
1 months ago
A: I agree, reliability is a major concern when using different interviewers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicia
2 months ago
I agree. Different interviewers could lead to inconsistent results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
2 months ago
I think reliability might be a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel