Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBDA Exam - Topic 3 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBDA exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 3
[All CBDA Questions]

To ensure their recommendation can be acted upon, the business analysis professional on the analytics team helps the team complete financial analysis to support their recommendation. As part of the financial analysis that's completed, the cost-benefit analysis shows positive net benefits starting in the 2nd year. The team feels this is sufficient to proceed with their strong endorsement of the recommendation. The business analysis professional:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sherrell
5 months ago
Cumulative net benefits should definitely be checked first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure those benefits will actually happen?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
6 months ago
Totally agree, quick benefits are a plus!
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
6 months ago
I think the risk is too high to proceed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
6 months ago
Positive net benefits in the 2nd year sounds good!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
6 months ago
I can see why they might agree with option C since quick benefits sound appealing, but I wonder if they considered all the risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
7 months ago
This reminds me of a practice question where we had to weigh immediate benefits against potential risks. I think option B could be valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like just having positive net benefits starting in the second year might not be enough to justify proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
7 months ago
I remember we discussed how cumulative net benefits can impact long-term decisions, so I think option D might be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
7 months ago
I'm a little concerned about the risk factor mentioned in option B. Even if the net benefits are positive, if the risk is too high, that could be a valid reason to disagree with the recommendation. I'll need to carefully weigh the potential risks and benefits before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
7 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is recognizing that the positive net benefits are occurring quickly, which suggests the recommendation should be approved. As long as the analysis is sound, I don't see a reason to disagree with the team's endorsement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about the business analysis professional's decision, but it's not clear what factors they should be considering beyond the cost-benefit analysis. I'll need to think carefully about the potential risks and long-term implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about cost-benefit analysis. I'd focus on understanding the key details - the positive net benefits starting in the 2nd year, and the team's strong endorsement. That should help me determine the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
7 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options - they seem to cover a range of different package deployment scenarios. I'll need to carefully read through each one to determine which three are most likely to occur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on this one. I think it might be that the user who owns the resource initiates a request to the OAuth client, but I'm not totally sure. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
12 months ago
Haha, maybe the business analyst should just flip a coin. That would be about as useful as some of these options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
12 months ago
Option B? Really? The team's done the work, and the numbers look good. What are they so afraid of? I say go for it!
upvoted 0 times
Rosann
10 months ago
Option B? Really? The team's done the work, and the numbers look good. What are they so afraid of? I say go for it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
10 months ago
C) Agrees recognizing that positive benefits are occurring quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
11 months ago
A) Agrees since all the necessary analysis work is complete
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fredric
12 months ago
Option A seems like the easy way out. We've got to do our due diligence here. I'd go with option D to make sure we're not missing anything important.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
10 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option D is the way to go to ensure we're thorough in our analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosita
11 months ago
I think option C is the best choice, positive benefits occurring quickly is a good sign to proceed with the recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
11 months ago
I agree with option D, we need to review the cumulative net benefits to ensure we're not missing anything important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
11 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option C is the way to go since positive benefits are occurring quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
11 months ago
I think option A is the best choice, all the necessary analysis work has been completed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
12 months ago
I agree with option D, we need to review the cumulative net benefits to be thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Judy
1 year ago
I'm not so sure about that. I'd lean more towards option D - the cumulative net benefits need to be reviewed before we can move forward. Rushing into this without a complete financial analysis could be risky.
upvoted 0 times
Brunilda
11 months ago
C) Agrees recognizing that positive benefits are occurring quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
11 months ago
D) Disagrees stating that the cumulative net benefits need to be reviewed
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
11 months ago
A) Agrees since all the necessary analysis work is complete
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
C) Agrees recognizing that positive benefits are occurring quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharee
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option C makes the most sense. Positive benefits starting in the second year is a pretty good sign, and the team seems confident in their recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
Myra
1 year ago
C) Agrees recognizing that positive benefits are occurring quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannie
1 year ago
C) Agrees recognizing that positive benefits are occurring quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 year ago
A) Agrees since all the necessary analysis work is complete
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Naomi
1 year ago
I disagree, we should review the cumulative net benefits before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
I agree with you, positive benefits in the 2nd year are a good sign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 year ago
I think the team should proceed with the recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel