Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA Exam CBDA Topic 2 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBDA exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 2
[All CBDA Questions]

An analyst at a bank is trying to identify research questions for an analytical study on top customer issues across branches. During an interview with a branch manager, the analyst asks the manager what their top customer concerns are relating to this branch?

After the manager's reply, the analyst asks a follow up question on how their top customer concerns compare against the top customer concerns across all branches? Was the analyst's follow-up question valid?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The analyst's follow-up question is valid because it helps to refine the scope and context of the research questions for the analytical study. By comparing the top customer concerns across branches, the analyst can identify the common and unique issues that affect customer satisfaction and loyalty. This can also help to prioritize the most critical or urgent problems that need to be addressed by the bank12. Reference: 1: Guide to Business Data Analytics, IIBA, 2020, p. 212: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, PMI, 2015, p. 43.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sean
4 days ago
I disagree. Comparing a single branch to the overall company is a waste of time. The analyst should focus on addressing the specific concerns of that branch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
10 days ago
The analyst's follow-up question is definitely valid. Comparing branch-specific concerns to company-wide data can help identify unique issues and opportunities for improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel