Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBDA Exam - Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBDA exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All CBDA Questions]

A marketing department has established an analytics team. The analytics practice is stand-alone and analysts have limited insights into corporate strategy. Which is an expected result for analytics practices operating at the business unit level?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kathrine
4 months ago
I thought analytics would always add value, this is surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
4 months ago
Definitely not A, that's for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit harsh!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
4 months ago
I totally agree, C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
5 months ago
Sounds like C is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
5 months ago
I recall that analytics at the business unit level often results in minimal value for the organization, so I lean towards option C being the most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like if the analytics team isn't aligned with corporate strategy, they might not drive the business plan effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
5 months ago
I think I came across a similar question where the focus was on how disconnected analytics can lead to less valuable insights. So, maybe C is the right choice here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
5 months ago
I remember studying how analytics teams can sometimes operate in silos, which might lead to them doing work that doesn't align with the overall strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The fact that the analytics team has limited insights into the corporate strategy is a clear red flag. That's likely to result in them doing analysis that doesn't really address the organization's most important priorities or challenges. Option C seems like the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tora
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I can see how having limited visibility into the overall corporate strategy could lead the analytics team to do work that's not that useful to the organization. But I'm not totally sure which of the answer choices best captures that. I may need to spend a bit more time reviewing the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. Since the analytics team is operating in a silo, they're probably not going to be doing work that's closely tied to the organization's business plan or strategic goals. That means their insights may not be as valuable or impactful as they could be. I'm going to go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The question seems to be getting at some potential downsides of having a standalone analytics team. I'll need to think through the different options carefully to figure out which one best captures that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
6 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the fact that the analytics team has limited insights into the overall corporate strategy. That's likely to lead to analysis that doesn't really align with the organization's priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The tools and techniques listed are all part of the quality control process, which involves monitoring and measuring the quality of a product or service to ensure it meets requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
6 months ago
I might be leaning towards B too, since it's more about justifying the program rather than directly helping in the emergency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
2 years ago
D seems unlikely without strategic insights. C is still the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 years ago
True, but what about D? Could they get competitive advantage anyway?
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
2 years ago
Exactly, C for sure. They won't drive business decisions effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 years ago
Yeah, C makes sense. Without strategic alignment, what's the point?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 years ago
I think it's C. Minimal value analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 years ago
This question is tricky. What do you guys think?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel