Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part3 Topic 6 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part3 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 6
[All IIA-CIA-Part3 Questions]

An organization that relies heavily on IT wants to contain the impact of potential business disruption to a period of approximately four to seven days. Which of the following

business recovery strategies would most efficiently meet this organization's needs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Anisha
3 months ago
Wait, so they want to recover in 4-7 days? I'm more of a 'work from the beach' kind of recovery plan, if you know what I mean. Where's the option for that?
upvoted 0 times
Alfred
1 months ago
True, having everything ready to go at a moment's notice can make a big difference in minimizing the impact of a business disruption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
2 months ago
Option A) A recovery strategy where hardware has been reserved for purchase and data backups are in place could work, but it may not be as efficient as having a fully secured separate site.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
I agree, having a separate site ready to go with real-time data synchronization is crucial for a quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
3 months ago
Option B) A recovery strategy whereby a separate site has been secured and is ready for use, with fully configured hardware and real-time synchronized data would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
3 months ago
Option C seems like a good compromise between having a separate site and having the necessary funds ready. Not as fancy as Option B, but could still get the job done in the required timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
3 months ago
Hah, Option A? Reserving hardware and hoping for the best? That's like trying to build a house while the foundation is still being laid. Not very efficient if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Emogene
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, it's better to have a separate site secured and ready to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Demetra
2 months ago
User 1: Option A? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, Option A does seem risky. It's better to be prepared with a fully configured site and synchronized data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
2 months ago
User 1: Option B seems like the best choice. Having a separate site secured and ready to go with real-time synchronized data is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rene
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option D. The ability to configure the hardware as needed and have the data backups ready to go could give you a bit more flexibility in the recovery process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
3 months ago
I'm not sure, option A also seems like a good choice with reserved hardware and data backups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
3 months ago
Option B sounds like the most robust and efficient recovery strategy to me. Four to seven days is a pretty tight timeline, so having a separate site that's ready to go with all the necessary hardware and data is key.
upvoted 0 times
Melda
2 months ago
Option D could work, but having fully configured hardware ready to go is a big advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
Option A might be too risky since the separate site has not been determined yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
2 months ago
Having a separate site with real-time synchronized data is crucial for minimizing downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for a quick recovery.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Olene
3 months ago
I agree with Dong, option B ensures a separate site is ready with real-time synchronized data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
4 months ago
I think option B would be the best choice for containing business disruption to 4-7 days.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel