Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part1 Topic 7 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part1 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 7
[All IIA-CIA-Part1 Questions]

An engagement supervisor noted that an internal auditor's personal relationship with a process owner resulted in the auditor providing a favorable and partial assessment during an audit within that process owner's are

a. According to MA guidance, which of the following should be used to manage this impairment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Pura
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old problem of auditors getting a little too cozy with the process owners. I bet the answer is a functional reporting placement, but I'm tempted to choose the employee disciplinary policy just to see the look on the process owner's face.
upvoted 0 times
Royal
16 days ago
That might send a strong message to prevent future conflicts of interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
17 days ago
I would choose the employee disciplinary policy just to shake things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
21 days ago
I agree, it's important to maintain independence in audits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
29 days ago
I think the answer is a functional reporting placement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I'm totally stumped on this one. Maybe we should just flip a coin and call it a day? Seriously though, I think a functional reporting placement is the way to go, but I'm open to other opinions.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
1 months ago
Let's go with that then, a functional reporting placement it is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
1 months ago
I agree, having a functional reporting placement can help manage the impairment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
1 months ago
I think a functional reporting placement is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariann
3 months ago
Haha, an internal audit charter? That's like trying to put out a fire with a feather duster. I think a functional reporting placement is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Eva
1 months ago
A functional audit committee could also provide oversight and guidance in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
2 months ago
An internal audit charter is important too, it sets the tone for the audit function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
2 months ago
I agree, a functional reporting placement would help maintain independence and objectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brinda
3 months ago
An employee disciplinary policy? Really? That seems a bit extreme for this situation. I'd go with a functional audit committee to help provide some oversight and ensure the assessment is fair and impartial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
3 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I think a functional reporting placement would be the best way to manage this impairment, but I'm not entirely sure. Guess I'll have to do some more research on the MA guidance.
upvoted 0 times
Sharen
1 months ago
It's important to follow the MA guidance to address this issue properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
1 months ago
Maybe involving a functional audit committee could provide a different perspective on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
1 months ago
I think an internal audit charter might also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
2 months ago
I agree, a functional reporting placement could help manage the impairment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marshall
3 months ago
But wouldn't having a functional audit committee help ensure independence and objectivity in the audit process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) A functional reporting placement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
I think the answer is C) A functional audit committee.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel