Which of the following is the most appropriate way to ensure that a newly formed internal audit activity remains free from undue influence by management?
I'm going with C) because it's the best way to keep the auditors from being under the thumb of management. Unless, of course, the audit committee is filled with management's friends. Then we're all doomed!
A) Appointing the chief audit executive as a board member is a bit concerning. This could blur the lines of independence and create potential conflicts of interest.
B) Adopting written policies and procedures approved by the board is also a good approach. This creates a clear framework for the internal audit activity to operate within.
D) Establishing the internal audit activity's position within the organization in an audit charter is a great idea. This formalizes the independence and authority of the internal audit function.
C) Ensuring the chief audit executive reports administratively to the audit committee seems like the most effective way to maintain independence. The audit committee is a neutral body that can provide oversight and protection from undue influence by management.
Sabra
27 days agoMabelle
29 days agoJade
9 days agoMiriam
14 days agoArminda
18 days agoLenny
1 months agoSean
1 days agoTruman
3 days agoMike
1 months agoKrystina
16 days agoJunita
28 days agoShala
2 months agoRusty
2 months agoEleonore
2 months agoAdolph
8 days agoLaquanda
15 days agoMerilyn
24 days agoLudivina
1 months agoShala
2 months ago