Which of the following is the most appropriate way to ensure that a newly formed internal audit activity remains free from undue influence by management?
I'm going with C) because it's the best way to keep the auditors from being under the thumb of management. Unless, of course, the audit committee is filled with management's friends. Then we're all doomed!
A) Appointing the chief audit executive as a board member is a bit concerning. This could blur the lines of independence and create potential conflicts of interest.
B) Adopting written policies and procedures approved by the board is also a good approach. This creates a clear framework for the internal audit activity to operate within.
D) Establishing the internal audit activity's position within the organization in an audit charter is a great idea. This formalizes the independence and authority of the internal audit function.
C) Ensuring the chief audit executive reports administratively to the audit committee seems like the most effective way to maintain independence. The audit committee is a neutral body that can provide oversight and protection from undue influence by management.
Sabra
2 months agoMabelle
3 months agoJade
2 months agoMiriam
2 months agoArminda
2 months agoLenny
3 months agoLong
1 months agoSean
2 months agoTruman
2 months agoMike
3 months agoSherita
27 days agoJohna
30 days agoKrystina
2 months agoJunita
2 months agoShala
3 months agoRusty
3 months agoEleonore
3 months agoAdolph
2 months agoLaquanda
2 months agoMerilyn
2 months agoLudivina
3 months agoShala
3 months ago