Option C is the way to go. Needing the CFO's approval to request information? That's like asking a fox to guard the henhouse. No way that's going to end well for objectivity.
B) An internal auditor, who was an accounts receivable intern for the organization three years prior, performs an audit of the accounts receivable cycle.
Haha, imagine if the auditor was related to the CFO in option A. Talk about a family reunion during the audit! Definitely a recipe for a lack of objectivity.
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Both scenarios could lead to compromised objectivity, but I think C might be the bigger issue. Having to get approval from the CFO could really limit the auditor's independence.
Option B seems like the most obvious choice. Having been an accounts receivable intern could seriously impact the auditor's objectivity, even if it was years ago.
B) An internal auditor, who was an accounts receivable intern for the organization three years prior, performs an audit of the accounts receivable cycle.
Delmy
3 months agoFlorinda
2 months agoGeorgeanna
2 months agoVeronica
2 months agoWei
3 months agoTawny
2 months agoGerald
2 months agoEna
2 months agoRusty
2 months agoSue
3 months agoVivan
3 months agoGianna
3 months agoSherrell
3 months agoCorinne
3 months agoAnnmarie
3 months agoLouis
2 months agoMarge
2 months agoShoshana
2 months agoChristiane
3 months ago