Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA-ACCA Exam - Topic 7 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-ACCA exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 7
[All IIA-ACCA Questions]

An internal auditor has been asked to conduct an investigation involving allegations of independent contractor fraud. Which of the following controls would be least effective in detecting any potential fraudulent activity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Aretha
4 months ago
D is probably the least effective control here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
4 months ago
Periodic reconciliations are a must-have!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Monthly reviews? Really? I doubt they catch everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
5 months ago
I think documented policies are crucial too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
Exception reports are super useful for spotting fraud!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
5 months ago
Monthly reviews seem proactive, but I wonder if they could miss subtle fraud compared to more direct controls like reconciliations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rocco
5 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like periodic reconciliations would be more effective than just having policies in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
5 months ago
I think documented policies are important, but they don't actively detect fraud, right? They just set the framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how exception reports can be really useful for spotting anomalies, but I'm not sure if they catch everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
6 months ago
Based on my understanding of fraud detection, the monthly management review of all contractor activity would be the least effective. It's too high-level and infrequent to catch any specific instances of fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
6 months ago
I'm a bit stumped on this one. All the options seem like they could be effective in their own way. I'll have to think it through carefully before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
6 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The exception report identifying payment anomalies seems like the most obvious control to detect any shady activity by the contractors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm thinking the least effective control would be the documented policy and procedures since those can be easily overlooked or ignored by determined fraudsters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the context correctly. Detecting fraud by independent contractors is the key focus, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to identify which options involve the VM being powered on or off when adding/reducing resources. That should help me determine the right prerequisites.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The valid version statuses are "Working" and "Submitted". Those are the ones that let you run batch validations and fix any issues before exporting to target systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit torn between options A and B. Both annotations and resource tags could work, but I'm wondering if a resource tag might be a bit more flexible and easier to manage in the long run. I'll probably go with option B, but I'll double-check the documentation just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
10 months ago
I'm going with the documented policy and procedures. Who needs controls when you can just have a nicely written document telling people not to be naughty?
upvoted 0 times
Fredric
9 months ago
C) Periodic account reconciliation of contractor charges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
9 months ago
B) Documented policy and procedures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
9 months ago
A) Exception report identifying payment anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meaghan
11 months ago
Periodic account reconciliation? Pfft, that's too much work. I'm going with the exception report - let the computer do all the heavy lifting, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Martina
9 months ago
User 3: I think having both the exception report and periodic account reconciliation would be the most effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
9 months ago
User 2: But what if the fraud is happening in between the exceptions? Maybe the periodic account reconciliation is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
9 months ago
User 1: I agree, the exception report is definitely the easiest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
10 months ago
User 3: Monthly management review could also be helpful in detecting fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
10 months ago
User 2: But what about the importance of documented policies and procedures?
upvoted 0 times
...
Audrie
10 months ago
User 1: I agree, let the computer do the work with the exception report.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleisha
11 months ago
Hah, these auditors are really trying to trip us up! I bet they're sitting back laughing at all the poor souls who fall for the 'least effective' trap.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
11 months ago
I'd say the monthly management review is the least effective. Fraudsters are usually pretty clever at covering their tracks, so that might not catch much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
11 months ago
Option B is the least effective. Documented policies and procedures don't really detect fraud on their own. You need actual controls and oversight.
upvoted 0 times
Marvel
10 months ago
C) Periodic account reconciliation of contractor charges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
10 months ago
B) I agree, documented policies and procedures are important but they are not enough to detect fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
11 months ago
A) Exception report identifying payment anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Twila
11 months ago
I disagree. I believe A) Exception report identifying payment anomalies would be the least effective, as it may not capture all types of fraud.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
12 months ago
I agree with Sean. Monthly reviews may not catch fraud as quickly as the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
12 months ago
I think the least effective control would be D) Monthly management review of all contractor activity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel