Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam CPEA Topic 1 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's CPEA exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 1
[All CPEA Questions]

Directors and officers of a corporation:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Millie
3 months ago
Option B sounds like the answer that won't get me in trouble. Gotta cover my bases, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
1 months ago
User 3: I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, exercising due diligence is key to avoiding trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
2 months ago
User 1: Option B does seem like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bronwyn
3 months ago
Haha, I hope option C is true. That would be a get-out-of-jail-free card for all the corporate bigwigs!
upvoted 0 times
Eden
1 months ago
I'm not sure about that, I think they should always be held responsible for environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
1 months ago
I think option B is more realistic. They can avoid responsibility if they exercise due diligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
2 months ago
I wish option C was true too! That would make things a lot easier for the directors and officers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tayna
3 months ago
I'm going with C. Directors can't be held liable for property damage caused by the corporation. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Delfina
30 days ago
I see your point, but I'm sticking with D. Directors are always responsible for environmental damage caused by a corporation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 months ago
Hmm, interesting point. I still think C is the best choice. Directors cannot be held liable for property damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
1 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I believe B is the correct answer. They can avoid responsibility if they exercise due diligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beula
2 months ago
I think it's actually A. Directors may be responsible for environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Son
3 months ago
D seems like the safest option, but I'm not sure. Corporations should be held accountable for environmental damage, right?
upvoted 0 times
Chery
2 months ago
B) May avoid responsibility for environmental damage if they exercise due diligence
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
Corporations should definitely be held accountable for environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
A) May be responsible for environmental damage
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kate
3 months ago
But they are always responsible for environmental damage caused by a corporation, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
3 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Directors and officers can avoid liability if they exercise due diligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
3 months ago
I agree with Tracey, they can avoid responsibility if they exercise due diligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
3 months ago
I think directors and officers may be responsible for environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel