Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIA Exam CPEA Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's CPEA exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All CPEA Questions]

Directors and officers:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lai at Feb 03, 2023, 01:08 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPEA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marshall
2 months ago
Option C - 'Have no obligation with respect to environmental damage.' Yeah, right. Good luck getting that one past the eco-police!
upvoted 0 times
Ngoc
9 days ago
D) Can only be responsible for environmental damage if they were directly involved in its creation
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
10 days ago
Option C - 'Have no obligation with respect to environmental damage.' Yeah, right. Good luck getting that one past the eco-police!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
12 days ago
B) May be personally responsible for allowing pollution to occur unless they can show that they used due diligence to prevent the pollution from occurring
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
23 days ago
A) Should protect themselves from environmental liability by refusing to become personally responsible
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiera
2 months ago
B is the way to go. You gotta be on top of your environmental game as a director or officer these days. No slacking allowed, even if it means getting your hands a little dirty.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
23 days ago
User 3: It's important to show that we used due diligence to prevent any damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
28 days ago
User 2: Definitely, we can't just sit back and ignore our environmental responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, we have to be proactive in preventing pollution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Karrie
3 months ago
How about option A? Seems like a smart way to protect yourself - just refuse to be responsible for anything, right? Wait, that can't be right...
upvoted 0 times
Gary
2 months ago
User 3: So option B is the way to go then, to protect yourself from environmental liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 months ago
User 2: Carmela is right. Directors and officers may be personally responsible unless they can show due diligence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
2 months ago
User 1: Option A seems like a risky move. You can't just refuse to be responsible for environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissia
3 months ago
I believe directors and officers can only be responsible for environmental damage if they were directly involved in its creation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
Option D is too narrow. Directors and officers can be held responsible even if they weren't directly involved in the pollution, as long as they failed to prevent it.
upvoted 0 times
Galen
2 months ago
Option D is too narrow. Directors and officers can be held responsible even if they weren't directly involved in the pollution, as long as they failed to prevent it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
B) May be personally responsible for allowing pollution to occur unless they can show that they used due diligence to prevent the pollution from occurring
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
2 months ago
A) Should protect themselves from environmental liability by refusing to become personally responsible
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dalene
3 months ago
I disagree, they may be personally responsible if they didn't use due diligence to prevent pollution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
3 months ago
I think directors and officers should protect themselves from environmental liability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
3 months ago
Option B seems like the correct answer. Directors and officers can't just turn a blind eye to environmental issues - they need to show they've done their due diligence to prevent pollution.
upvoted 0 times
Rebeca
3 months ago
They can't just ignore their responsibilities when it comes to the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
3 months ago
It's important for them to show they used due diligence in preventing environmental damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
3 months ago
Yes, they can be personally responsible if they don't take proper precautions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
3 months ago
I agree, directors and officers have a responsibility to prevent pollution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel