Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IFPUG I40-420 Exam - Topic 3 Question 44 Discussion

Phase 1 of an application enhancement adds 2 business function attributes to each of 3 files. No changes were made to reference the new attributes. Prior to the enhancement each of these files was valued at 3 RETs and 12 DETs. What is the CHGA of these files?
D) 0 UFP
A) 21 UFP
B) 45 UFP
C) 30 UFP

IFPUG I40-420 Exam - Topic 3 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for IFPUG's I40-420 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 3
[All I40-420 Questions]

Phase 1 of an application enhancement adds 2 business function attributes to each of 3 files. No changes were made to reference the new attributes. Prior to the enhancement each of these files was valued at 3 RETs and 12 DETs. What is the CHGA of these files?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lorean at May 06, 2022, 01:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium I40-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Vincent
7 months ago
But what if the new attributes don't count?
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
7 months ago
Totally agree, 30 UFP makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
8 months ago
I think it's 30 UFP total.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
8 months ago
Each file has 3 RETs and 12 DETs, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
8 months ago
I feel like the answer could be 0 UFP since no changes were made to reference the new attributes, but I need to double-check that logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
8 months ago
If each file had 3 RETs and 12 DETs, adding 2 attributes might change the UFP, but I can't recall the exact formula for CHGA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
8 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to calculate UFP after enhancements, and I think we just add the new attributes to the existing totals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
8 months ago
I think we need to calculate the UFP based on the new attributes added, but I'm not entirely sure how to adjust the RETs and DETs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the common ground between law enforcement and private resources. I'll carefully read through the options and try to recall the key points from the Hallcrest I text.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
8 months ago
I think the users govern a blockchain because it's decentralized, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
8 months ago
I feel like option C is right too, especially with how it emphasizes defining the service clearly, but I could be mixing it up with some other principles we explored.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel