New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IFPUG I40-420 Exam - Topic 2 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for IFPUG's I40-420 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 2
[All I40-420 Questions]

An application enhancement adds 3 business functional attributes to each of 3 files. Each of these files had been valued at 2 RETs and 19 DETs. All of the DETs for each of these files are maintained using the same screen in the application. What is the functional size of the transactional function after the enhancement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lorenza
3 months ago
Definitely not just 3, that’s too low!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure those DETs are all counted?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
4 months ago
I think it should be 6 after the enhancement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
4 months ago
Yeah, adding 3 attributes means more complexity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
4 months ago
Each file had 2 RETs and 19 DETs, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
4 months ago
I feel like the enhancement might not change the count if they’re just additional attributes. Maybe it’s not counted at all?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
4 months ago
If each file had 2 RETs and 19 DETs, does adding 3 attributes mean we just add those to the existing counts? I'm confused about how that works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
5 months ago
I remember a similar question where we had to add attributes to files, and it was tricky figuring out how they impacted the overall size.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
5 months ago
I think we need to calculate the functional size based on the RETs and DETs, but I'm not entirely sure how the new attributes affect the total.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michell
5 months ago
Wait, I'm not sure that's right. Wouldn't we need to consider the complexity of the new transactional function as well? With 19 DETs, it seems like it might be more than just a simple 3 points.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrel
5 months ago
I think I've got this. Since the enhancement added 3 business functional attributes to each of the 3 files, that's a total of 9 new attributes. And since they're all maintained on the same screen, that's just 1 new transactional function. So the answer should be 3, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
5 months ago
You know, you're probably right. I'm going to re-read the question carefully and try to figure out the best approach to calculating the functional size here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Son
5 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the functional size of the transactional function after an enhancement, so I'll need to consider the changes to the files and screens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
10 months ago
I'm just imagining the developer who has to maintain this application after the enhancement. They're probably sitting at their desk, staring at the screen, and muttering, 'Why, oh why, did I choose this career path?'
upvoted 0 times
Maryann
9 months ago
C) 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
9 months ago
B) 4
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
9 months ago
A) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benedict
10 months ago
I bet the people who wrote this question were having a field day coming up with ways to confuse us. 'Oh, let's add some extra DETs, but make them all use the same screen. That'll really throw them off!'
upvoted 0 times
Chery
9 months ago
D) Not counted
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
9 months ago
I know right, they really tried to make this one tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
9 months ago
C) 6
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
9 months ago
B) 4
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
10 months ago
A) 3
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyssa
10 months ago
D) Not counted? Really? That's like saying, 'Hey, we made your job a whole lot harder, but we're not going to count that.' Nah, I'm going with C) 6. It's the only answer that makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
10 months ago
Hold on, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this. So, we have 3 files, each with 2 RETs and 19 DETs, and now we're adding 3 more DETs to each file. Hmm, let me think this through...
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer might be D) Not counted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
11 months ago
I agree with Hoa, because each file had 3 business functional attributes added.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) 6. The application enhancement adds 3 business functional attributes to each of 3 files, so that's a total of 3 × 3 = 9 additional DETs. Since all the DETs are maintained using the same screen, it's a single transactional function, so the functional size is 6 (3 RETs + 9 DETs).
upvoted 0 times
Tegan
9 months ago
Great job on figuring that out! The answer is indeed C) 6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
9 months ago
So, the answer is C) 6. Got it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latricia
9 months ago
Yes, that's correct. The functional size after the enhancement is indeed 6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
10 months ago
I think the answer is C) 6. The application enhancement adds 3 business functional attributes to each of 3 files, so that's a total of 3 × 3 = 9 additional DETs. Since all the DETs are maintained using the same screen, it's a single transactional function, so the functional size is 6 (3 RETs + 9 DETs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hoa
11 months ago
I think the answer is C) 6.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel