Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IFPUG I40-420 Exam - Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Posted by Justine on May 11, 2024 at 01:06 AM

The boundary for the function point count:

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium I40-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
JA
Jamika 11 months ago
I’m surprised that D is even an option, feels off!
MI
Mike 11 months ago
A is just a part of the picture, not the whole boundary.
RA
Ramonita 11 months ago
Wait, isn't it supposed to include technical aspects too?
CO
Corrina 11 months ago
Definitely agree with C, it makes the most sense.
JO
Josephine 12 months ago
I think option B is spot on!
KA
Karrie 12 months ago
I recall something about implementation affecting the boundary, so D might be a possibility, but I need to double-check my notes on that.
CH
Charlena 12 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing things up, but I think the boundary should focus on what the application does for users, which could be B or C.
EL
Elza 1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed how the boundary relates to the user interface, which makes me lean towards C.
PA
Paulene 1 year ago
I think the boundary for function point count is more about user views rather than technical aspects, so maybe B? But I'm not entirely sure.
CO
Corrinne 1 year ago
This is a good one. I think the boundary should be based on the user's perspective, not just the technical details. I'll try to reason through the options and see which one best fits that criteria.
RE
Rebbeca 1 year ago
I've seen questions like this before. The boundary is all about the conceptual interface between the user and the application, so I'm leaning towards option C.
SA
Salley 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read the options a few times to make sure I understand the nuances between them.
ED
Edward 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to focus on whether the boundary is based on the user view or technical considerations. I'll eliminate the options that seem too implementation-focused.
MA
Malinda 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the options and how they relate to the concept of the boundary for the function point count.
OD
Odelia 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Are they looking for a specific tool within the vRealize suite, or just any tool that can do this? I'll have to carefully consider each option.
DE
Delbert 1 year ago
Option C stands out to me as well. Validating the employee list seems like the best way to catch any fraudulent activity in the payroll process.
LA
Lacresha 1 year ago
Haha, the boundary is like a force field around the application, keeping the user's world and the app's world separate. Option C is the winner!
MA
Matthew 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
Definitely, it's all about defining the interface between the user's perspective and the application's functionality.
MA
Marget 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
I think option C is the most accurate description of the function point count boundary.
GW
Gwen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
Yeah, it's like a bridge between the internal and external worlds of the application.
SH
Sheldon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lacresha
I agree, option C makes the most sense. It's like a barrier between the user and the application.
SH
Shalon 1 year ago
C all the way! The boundary is the interface between the internal and external application world. Simple as that!
KA
Kassandra 1 year ago
D sounds like the way to go. The boundary is definitely dependent on implementation and technical considerations.
GE
German 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but option B seems like it might be the correct answer. The boundary should be user-focused, right?
AR
Art 1 year ago
↳ replying to German
User 3: Yes, the function point count boundary is definitely about the user view.
JA
Jamey 1 year ago
↳ replying to German
User 2: I agree, the boundary should be based on the user perspective.
BU
Bulah 1 year ago
↳ replying to German
User 1: I think option B is correct. It's all about the user view.
AR
Arthur 2 years ago
Option C seems logical, as the boundary should be based on the user's perspective rather than technical details.
SH
Sharmaine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
I'm leaning towards option C, it seems like the most logical choice.
SA
Salena 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
Option B makes sense too, it should be based on the user view.
SC
Scarlet 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
I think option A is also important, as it encloses the physical data maintained by the application.
DE
Devora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Arthur
I agree, the boundary should definitely be based on the user's perspective.
SO
Sonia 2 years ago
I believe the boundary for the function point count should enclose the physical data maintained by the application to accurately measure its size.
JE
Jesus 2 years ago
I agree with Crista. The boundary should represent the conceptual interface between the internal user world and external application world.
CR
Crista 2 years ago
I think the boundary for the function point count is based on the user view, not on technical considerations.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel