Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C2090-623 Topic 8 Question 85 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C2090-623 exam
Question #: 85
Topic #: 8
[All C2090-623 Questions]

An administrator is reviewing the memory allocations listed below in the current environment.

Which action should the administrator take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Ligia at May 01, 2025, 08:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C2090-623 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Glenn
2 months ago
I don't know, these memory allocations look a bit like a game of Tetris to me. Maybe we should call in the pros to sort this out. Or just get a bigger memory stick, that usually does the trick!
upvoted 0 times
Samira
1 months ago
User 3: Increasing the current heap size by 20% might also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
1 months ago
User 2: No, we should just get a bigger memory stick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should increase the committed heap size by 50%.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janey
2 months ago
Decrease the maximum heap size by 25%? What is this, amateur hour? Option D is a hard pass for me, my friend. Let's keep things juiced up and ready to go!
upvoted 0 times
Barney
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Increasing the current heap size by 2Barney% will give us the boost we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
2 months ago
I agree, we need to keep things running smoothly. Let's go with option C and increase the committed heap size by 5Barney%.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissa
3 months ago
Whoa, 50% increase on the committed heap size? That's a bold move, but I like it! Option C gets my vote. Let's really crank this thing up to 11!
upvoted 0 times
Margart
1 months ago
I'm not sure about Option C. Maybe we should consider the other options first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
2 months ago
I agree with you, let's go big or go home! Option C all the way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
2 months ago
I think Option C is too risky. We should go with a more conservative approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
2 months ago
Option C sounds like a good idea. Let's boost that committed heap size!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denise
3 months ago
I agree with Margurite, increasing the committed heap size seems like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
But increasing the committed heap size can help improve performance and prevent out of memory errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
3 months ago
Hold up, I'm seeing some room for improvement here. I'd go with option B and give that heap size a nice little boost. It'll keep the system running smoother than a well-oiled machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe no action is needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
3 months ago
Hmm, I think option A is the way to go. Why mess with a good thing, right? Seems like the memory allocations are just fine as they are.
upvoted 0 times
Georgeanna
2 months ago
Yep, I think leaving it as is would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
I agree, let's not fix something that isn't broken.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 months ago
Option A sounds good to me too. No need to make any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
3 months ago
I think the administrator should increase the committed heap size by 50%.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel