An architect is deploying an application to an IBM Cloud OpenShift cluster that requires persistent storage. Which two options provide storage that spans zones within a region?
When deploying an application to an IBM Cloud OpenShift cluster that requires persistent storage across zones within a region, Portworx and Block Storage are viable options.
Portworx: This is a cloud-native storage solution designed for containerized environments like Kubernetes and OpenShift. Portworx provides highly available, scalable, and persistent storage that spans multiple zones within a region, ensuring data redundancy and availability.
Block Storage: IBM Cloud Block Storage provides persistent, high-performance storage that can be attached to virtual servers or containers. It is designed to offer cross-zone availability when configured with the necessary replication and redundancy settings.
Comparison with Other Options:
A (Kubernetes local volume storage): Not suitable for spanning multiple zones as it is tied to specific nodes.
B (Object Storage): Designed for storing large amounts of unstructured data; it is not typically used for persistent storage in Kubernetes.
D (NetApp on Tap): Primarily used for network-attached storage and might not be optimized for persistent storage across multiple zones in OpenShift.
IBM Cloud Block Storage Documentation
Portworx on IBM Cloud
IBM Cloud Architect Exam Study Guide
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!