New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-172 Exam - Topic 3 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-172 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 3
[All C1000-172 Questions]

Why does IBM Cloud Analytics Engine decouple compute and storage?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

IBM Cloud Analytics Engine decouples compute and storage to provide independent scaling and cost management capabilities. This approach allows organizations to scale compute resources (such as CPU and memory) separately from storage resources, optimizing both performance and cost.

Independent Scaling: Decoupling compute and storage means that users can scale the computational power (e.g., number of nodes, processing capabilities) independently of the storage capacity (e.g., data stored in IBM Cloud Object Storage). This is particularly useful in data analytics workloads where the compute requirements may vary significantly over time, but the storage requirements remain relatively constant.

Cost Control: By allowing compute and storage to be managed separately, users have greater flexibility to control costs. For example, users can increase compute power temporarily to handle a peak workload without the need to increase storage costs. Conversely, they can store large datasets without paying for unused compute capacity. This decoupling leads to a more cost-effective and efficient use of cloud resources.

Advantages in Cloud Environments: Decoupling compute and storage aligns with the best practices in modern cloud environments, where elasticity, scalability, and cost efficiency are paramount. It allows organizations to adapt quickly to changing business needs and workload demands, reducing overhead and improving resource utilization.


IBM Cloud Analytics Engine Documentation

IBM Cloud Architect Exam Study Guide

IBM Cloud Object Storage

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chantell
21 hours ago
Really? I doubt storage can’t be scaled. Sounds fishy!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
6 days ago
Wow, I didn’t know compute could scale independently like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
11 days ago
I think A makes more sense. Storage costs are fixed, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
16 days ago
C is the right answer! It’s all about scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacki
22 days ago
Haha, I bet the IBM engineers were like "Compute and storage? Nah, let's just make them do their own thing!"
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
27 days ago
I agree with C. Gotta love that independent scaling, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 month ago
I feel like I’ve seen something similar before, and it was definitely about achieving scale independently. C sounds right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought storage was fixed and compute could be scaled, so maybe A? But C seems to fit as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
1 month ago
I remember a practice question about scaling resources, and I think it was about how compute and storage can be managed separately. Could be C too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
2 months ago
I think the answer might be C, but I'm not entirely sure why they would want to control costs specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 months ago
Ah, I see. The key is that decoupling allows you to scale them independently. That makes sense for controlling costs. I'll mark C as my final answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
This seems straightforward. Decoupling allows you to scale compute and storage separately, which is more efficient than being limited by one or the other. I'm confident C is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
2 months ago
Definitely C. Decoupling compute and storage is the way to go for maximum flexibility and cost optimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
2 months ago
C) To achieve scale independently and control costs
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is it saying that compute can be scaled but not storage? Or the other way around? I'll need to re-read the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
3 months ago
Not sure about B, seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
3 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Decoupling compute and storage allows you to scale them independently, which helps control costs. I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards C as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel