IBM C1000-172 Exam - Topic 3 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-172 exam

Question #: 10
Topic #: 3

[All C1000-172 Questions]

What is a reason for using File Storage (Classic) on IBM Cloud?

AIt allows the user to adjust the amount of performance as needed

BIt protects against data in transit failures

CIt is scalable during provisioning

DIt provides asynchronous reads and writes

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

File Storage (Classic) on IBM Cloud allows users to adjust the performance as needed by choosing different tiers or adjusting the input/output operations per second (IOPS). This flexibility makes it suitable for workloads with varying performance requirements, such as databases, analytics, or content management systems, where the storage performance can be adjusted to match the workload demand.

Performance Adjustability: Users can choose between various performance levels or make adjustments to IOPS, allowing them to balance cost and performance based on current needs.

Why File Storage (Classic)? This flexibility makes File Storage (Classic) suitable for dynamic workloads that require changes in performance over time, such as during peak usage periods.

Comparison with Other Options:

Protects against data in transit failures (B) is not a primary feature of File Storage.

Scalable during provisioning (C) is partially correct, but 'adjusting performance' is more precise.

Asynchronous reads and writes (D) are general file system features, not unique to IBM Cloud File Storage.

IBM Cloud File Storage Documentation

IBM Cloud Architect Exam Study Guide

by Cyril at Sep 14, 2024, 07:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-172 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mica

3 months ago

Asynchronous reads and writes are a big plus too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosenda

3 months ago

I think it’s more about scalability during provisioning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gearldine

3 months ago

Wait, does it really protect against data in transit failures?

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

4 months ago

Totally agree, performance flexibility is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

France

4 months ago

It allows the user to adjust the amount of performance as needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deeann

4 months ago

I thought the main advantage was about protecting data during transit, but now I'm second-guessing myself after reviewing the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evette

4 months ago

I’m leaning towards option D because I remember reading about asynchronous operations, but I’m not confident if that applies to File Storage specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

4 months ago

I feel like I saw a question similar to this in practice, and I think scalability was mentioned as a benefit, but I can't recall the specifics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldo

5 months ago

I think I remember something about performance adjustments being a key feature, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main reason for using File Storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ailene

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards D. The ability to do asynchronous reads and writes could be really useful, especially for certain types of applications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

5 months ago

C could also be a good option. The fact that File Storage (Classic) is scalable during provisioning is a nice feature that might come in handy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

5 months ago

B seems like the best answer to me. Protecting against data in transit failures is a key benefit of using File Storage (Classic) on IBM Cloud.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucia

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through a bit more. The options seem pretty technical, so I'll need to review my notes on IBM Cloud storage options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Long

5 months ago

I think the answer is A. File Storage (Classic) on IBM Cloud allows you to adjust the performance as needed, which can be really useful for different workloads.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ria

1 year ago

This question is a real brain-teaser! I'm going to have to go with the classic 'adjust performance as needed' option, A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudia

1 year ago

Hmm, B about protecting against data in transit failures seems a bit too specific. I'll go with A.

upvoted 0 times

Alpha

1 year ago

User 3: A makes sense, it's always good to have control over performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annelle

1 year ago

User 2: I agree, scalability during provisioning is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassie

1 year ago

User 1: I think A is a good choice, it allows flexibility with performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmer

1 year ago

I think another reason could be that File Storage (Classic) provides asynchronous reads and writes, which can be beneficial for certain applications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

1 year ago

C is tempting, but I'm not sure if scalability during provisioning is a unique feature of File Storage (Classic).

upvoted 0 times

Louvenia

1 year ago

D) It provides asynchronous reads and writes

upvoted 0 times

...

Amie

1 year ago

C) It is scalable during provisioning

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

1 year ago

B) It protects against data in transit failures

upvoted 0 times

...

Tien

1 year ago

A) It allows the user to adjust the amount of performance as needed

upvoted 0 times

...

Audria

1 year ago

D sounds interesting, but I don't think asynchronous reads and writes are the main reason to use File Storage (Classic).

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

1 year ago

I agree with Dona. Being able to adjust performance is important for scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dona

1 year ago

I think the reason for using File Storage (Classic) is because it allows the user to adjust the amount of performance as needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

1 year ago

I think the correct answer is A. Being able to adjust the performance as needed is a key benefit of File Storage (Classic).

upvoted 0 times

Scarlet

1 year ago

Definitely, it's one of the reasons why File Storage (Classic) is a popular choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brandon

1 year ago

That's really convenient. I like having that flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

1 year ago

Yes, that's right. It allows the user to adjust the amount of performance as needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

1 year ago

I think the correct answer is A. Being able to adjust the performance as needed is a key benefit of File Storage (Classic).

upvoted 0 times

...

Fidelia

1 year ago

Yes, it's great to have that flexibility with File Storage (Classic).

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

1 year ago

I agree, being able to adjust performance is really useful.

upvoted 0 times

...