Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-172 Exam - Topic 1 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-172 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 1
[All C1000-172 Questions]

What is a benefit of using an IBM Cloud multizone region (MZR) for deploying applications?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

An IBM Cloud Multizone Region (MZR) offers a deployment architecture that spans multiple, physically separated availability zones within the same region. This configuration provides protection against a single zone failure, as applications and services can continue to operate if one zone experiences an outage.

Why MZR Provides Protection Against Single Zone Failure: Deploying applications in an MZR ensures that resources are distributed across multiple zones, each with its own independent infrastructure (power, cooling, networking). If a failure occurs in one zone, the other zones remain unaffected, thus maintaining the availability of the application.

Comparison with Other Options:

A (Reduced resiliency and availability): Incorrect; MZR increases resiliency and availability.

B (Decreased availability compared to a single zone): Incorrect; MZR offers greater availability than a single zone.

D (Lower interconnectivity speed): Incorrect; MZR is designed to provide high-speed interconnectivity between zones.


IBM Cloud Multizone Regions Overview

IBM Cloud Architect Exam Study Guide

by Lilli at Sep 07, 2024, 04:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-172 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cecily
4 months ago
B is just wrong, MZR is supposed to improve availability!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
4 months ago
C makes sense, but I wonder about the costs involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? I thought single zones were safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
5 months ago
Totally agree, MZR is all about that protection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
5 months ago
C is definitely the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought multizone regions were meant to improve connectivity, not lower it. So, D doesn’t sound right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
5 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about MZRs, and I think it mentioned something about protecting against failures. So, C seems likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
5 months ago
I'm not completely sure, but I feel like we discussed how MZRs help with resiliency. Could that be related to option C as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
6 months ago
I think I remember that multizone regions are supposed to enhance availability, so maybe option C is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. I know a multizone region is designed for high availability, so the answer is likely related to that. I'll go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
6 months ago
The key here is understanding the benefits of an IBM Cloud multizone region. I'll review what I know about that and try to eliminate the incorrect options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think the answer is C - protection against single zone failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know Kubernetes uses some kind of configuration files, but I can't remember if it's YAML or JSON. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
1 year ago
I'm just hoping the interconnectivity speed is fast enough to handle all the cloud puns I'm about to make.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
2 years ago
That's right, Micah. Having multiple zones helps distribute the workload and ensure that the application remains available even if one zone fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 years ago
Wait, so we're talking about IBM Cloud regions, not regions in Minecraft? I was about to suggest building a giant redstone machine in the MZR.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
1 year ago
C) Protection against single zone failure
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 year ago
Wait, so we're talking about IBM Cloud regions, not regions in Minecraft? I was about to suggest building a giant redstone machine in the MZR.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
1 year ago
C) Protection against single zone failure
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenny
1 year ago
A) Protection against single zone failure
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
2 years ago
Actually, Micah, using an IBM Cloud multizone region (MZR) provides increased resiliency and availability, not reduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
2 years ago
As an IT consultant, I can confidently say that C is the correct answer. MZRs offer that crucial protection against zone-level failures.
upvoted 0 times
Lea
1 year ago
It's important to consider the benefits of using an IBM Cloud multizone region for increased reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 year ago
MZRs definitely provide that extra layer of resiliency for deploying applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 year ago
I agree, having protection against single zone failure is essential for ensuring high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
2 years ago
A) Reduced resiliency and availability
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
2 years ago
I agree with Teri, having protection against single zone failure is crucial for ensuring high availability of applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
2 years ago
Definitely C. No one wants to deal with reduced resiliency or decreased availability, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
2 years ago
C) Protection against single zone failure
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
2 years ago
C is the way to go! Protecting against single zone failure is a major benefit of using an IBM Cloud MZR.
upvoted 0 times
Theola
1 year ago
Using an IBM Cloud MZR for protection against single zone failure is a smart choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 year ago
I always prioritize resiliency when deploying applications. C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
Agreed! It's important to have that level of protection for our applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
2 years ago
C is definitely the best option. Protecting against single zone failure is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel