New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-162 Exam - Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-162 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All C1000-162 Questions]

What feature in QRadar uses existing asset profile data so administrators can define unknown server types and assign them to a server definition in building blocks and in the network hierarchy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

In IBM Security QRadar SIEM V7.5, the feature that utilizes existing asset profile data to define unknown server types and assign them to server definitions in building blocks and in the network hierarchy is known as 'Server Discovery.' This feature grants permission to discover servers, thereby enabling administrators to identify and classify various server types within their network infrastructure, enhancing the overall asset management and security posture.


by Laquita at Aug 04, 2025, 09:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-162 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Farrah
2 months ago
Really? I doubt Server discovery is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not Active servers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
2 months ago
Server roles seems too broad for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
3 months ago
I thought it was Server profiles, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
3 months ago
It's definitely Server discovery!
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards Server roles, but I remember a question that mentioned server discovery as well. It's a bit confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
4 months ago
I feel like server profiles could be the right choice since they deal with asset data, but I might be mixing it up with another concept.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
4 months ago
I remember something about server roles being important for defining server types, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
4 months ago
I think the answer might be Server discovery, but I'm not entirely sure. It sounds familiar from the practice questions we went over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
4 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is specifically asking about a feature that uses asset profile data to define unknown server types, and that sounds exactly like the server profiles feature in QRadar. I'm going to select option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key seems to be that it's using existing asset profile data to define unknown server types. That sounds like it could be the server discovery feature, which automatically identifies new servers on the network. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions something about "server definition in building blocks and in the network hierarchy", so I'm not sure if server profiles is the right answer. I might need to re-read the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about server profiles in QRadar. That feature lets you define custom server types based on asset data, so I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Server roles? Really? That doesn't seem to have anything to do with defining unknown server types. D is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
5 months ago
I'm going with C - Server discovery. That sounds like the feature that would be able to identify and assign unknown server types.
upvoted 0 times
Tanesha
2 months ago
C seems to fit best for assigning server types!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards A - Server roles, but C is strong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
2 months ago
I think C - Server discovery is the right choice too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
3 months ago
Definitely! It makes sense for identifying unknown servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Refugia
5 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Server discovery is the best choice based on the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
6 months ago
I believe it could also be D) Server profiles, as it involves defining server types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
7 months ago
I agree with Ivan, Server discovery makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
7 months ago
Server profiles, definitely. That's the only option that mentions using existing asset data to define unknown server types.
upvoted 0 times
Mabelle
6 months ago
I think it's Server profiles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivan
7 months ago
I think the answer is C) Server discovery.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel