Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM C1000-162 Exam - Topic 2 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-162 exam

Question #: 8
Topic #: 2

[All C1000-162 Questions]

The magnitude rating of an offense in QRadar is calculated based on which values?

ARelevance, severity, importance

BRelevance, credibility, severity

CCriticality, severity, importance

DCriticality, severity, credibility

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

The magnitude rating of an offense in QRadar is calculated based on relevance, severity, and credibility. Relevance determines the impact on the network, credibility indicates the integrity of the offense, and severity represents the level of threat. QRadar uses complex algorithms to calculate and periodically re-evaluate the offense magnitude rating.

by Lucina at Apr 13, 2024, 08:58 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-162 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jacqueline

8 months ago

Wait, are you sure about that? Sounds off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

8 months ago

I agree with option A, that makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

8 months ago

Definitely relevance, credibility, and severity!

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

8 months ago

I thought it was criticality, severity, and credibility?

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

9 months ago

It's based on relevance, severity, and importance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andree

9 months ago

I’m leaning towards option A, but I vaguely recall something about credibility being important too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

9 months ago

I feel like I might be mixing up the terms. Was it criticality or importance that we discussed in class?

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

9 months ago

I remember practicing a similar question, and I think it was about criticality and severity. Maybe option D is correct?

upvoted 0 times

...

Johana

9 months ago

I think the magnitude rating involves relevance and severity, but I'm not sure if credibility is part of it.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

9 months ago

This seems straightforward - the question is asking about the values used to calculate the magnitude rating, and that sounds like it would be based on relevance, severity, and credibility. Option B looks good to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

9 months ago

The question mentions "magnitude rating", so I'm guessing it's looking for the factors that determine the magnitude, which sounds like it would be criticality, severity, and importance. I'll go with option C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

9 months ago

I'm pretty sure it's based on relevance, severity, and importance, so I'll go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mica

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the difference between relevance, credibility, and criticality. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jin

10 months ago

I'm pretty confident that option A is the way to go. Cloning the Strict profile and adding those extra security measures seems like the most comprehensive approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

10 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about the organizational structure. I'll carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes the management hierarchy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

10 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The first step is to collect data on the frequency and duration of the bullying behavior. That will give us a clear picture of the problem before we try to address it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

2 years ago

I think it's more about criticality, severity, credibility. That makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

2 years ago

That could be a possibility too. Criticality might play a role in determining the magnitude.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xuan

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. What about criticality, severity, importance?

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

2 years ago

I heard it's relevance, credibility, severity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

2 years ago

I think it's based on relevance, severity, importance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Xuan

2 years ago

Do you guys know how the magnitude rating of an offense in QRadar is calculated?

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

2 years ago

That could be a valid point too. Credibility might play a role in the rating.

upvoted 0 times

...

Clare

2 years ago

I'm not so sure. I think it might be relevance, credibility, severity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marya

2 years ago

I agree with Bettye. Those values make sense when determining the severity of an offense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettye

2 years ago

I think the magnitude rating is calculated based on relevance, severity, importance.

upvoted 0 times

Caitlin

2 years ago

That makes sense. So the answer is A) Relevance, severity, importance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Buddy

2 years ago

I believe the magnitude rating is calculated based on relevance, severity, importance.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Craig

2 years ago

I agree with Denae. C seems like the most logical answer based on what we've learned about QRadar in the course.

upvoted 0 times

...

Essie

2 years ago

Ugh, these QRadar questions are the worst. I swear, they're trying to trick us with these subtle differences in the answer choices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

2 years ago

I'm not sure about this one. The answer options all seem plausible. I think I need to review my notes again before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

2 years ago

I'm leaning towards C. Criticality, severity, and importance seem like the most logical factors to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

My

2 years ago

I think it's either B or D, but I'm not totally sure. The question is a bit ambiguous, in my opinion.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisha

2 years ago

Hmm, this question seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident I know the answer, but I want to hear what everyone else thinks before I decide.

upvoted 0 times

...