IBM C1000-150 Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-150 exam

Question #: 35
Topic #: 3

What should be supplied as part of the custom resource prior to deployment if it is desired to use a root CA signer certificate that is signed by a recognized certificate authority?

Aroot_ca_certificate

Broot_ca_key

Croot_ca_store

Droot_ca_secret

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

When setting up a demo environment an identity provider may not be known. In this case, htpasswd can be used to replace the default admin user with a simple identity provider. Htpasswd is an Apache utility for creating and updating user authentication files for the Apache web server. It uses a combination of plaintext passwords and a hashing algorithm to store its credentials.

by Ben at Jun 30, 2024, 03:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-150 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisha

6 months ago

I thought root_ca_secret was a thing too? Confused!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

6 months ago

Yeah, root_ca_certificate is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathern

6 months ago

Wait, are we sure it's not root_ca_store? Sounds off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrie

7 months ago

I think root_ca_key is more important, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

7 months ago

Definitely need the root_ca_certificate for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jules

7 months ago

I’m leaning towards root_ca_certificate as the answer, but I wish I had reviewed more about the specifics of CA deployment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

7 months ago

I feel like the root_ca_key could be important, but I can't recall if it's necessary for deployment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felice

8 months ago

I remember a practice question about certificate authorities, and I think the root_ca_store might be relevant too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

8 months ago

I think we need to provide the root_ca_certificate, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only thing required.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

8 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm wondering if the root CA store or secret might be needed instead of just the certificate. I'm going to have to think about this a bit more before deciding.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

8 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. If we want to use a root CA signer certificate, we'd need to provide the actual certificate, not just a store or secret. I'll go with A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johna

8 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. Do we need to provide the root CA key as well as the certificate? I'm torn between A and B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonna

8 months ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the root CA certificate would need to be supplied, so I'll go with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brittani

8 months ago

I'm not totally confident on this, but my best guess is that the root CA certificate is what needs to be supplied, since that's the actual certificate signed by the recognized CA. I'll select A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lynelle

8 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is to consider the scale of the FTTH users and how the VLAN switching scheme needs to accommodate that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiana

8 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. Since there's no known workaround, upgrading the kernel seems like the best way to address the vulnerability. Hiring more admins to monitor child processes doesn't really solve the root cause.

upvoted 0 times

...