New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-150 Exam - Topic 3 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-150 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 3
[All C1000-150 Questions]

What should be supplied as part of the custom resource prior to deployment if it is desired to use a root CA signer certificate that is signed by a recognized certificate authority?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When setting up a demo environment an identity provider may not be known. In this case, htpasswd can be used to replace the default admin user with a simple identity provider. Htpasswd is an Apache utility for creating and updating user authentication files for the Apache web server. It uses a combination of plaintext passwords and a hashing algorithm to store its credentials.


by Ben at Jun 30, 2024, 03:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-150 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lisha
3 months ago
I thought root_ca_secret was a thing too? Confused!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
3 months ago
Yeah, root_ca_certificate is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not root_ca_store? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
4 months ago
I think root_ca_key is more important, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
4 months ago
Definitely need the root_ca_certificate for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
4 months ago
I’m leaning towards root_ca_certificate as the answer, but I wish I had reviewed more about the specifics of CA deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
4 months ago
I feel like the root_ca_key could be important, but I can't recall if it's necessary for deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
4 months ago
I remember a practice question about certificate authorities, and I think the root_ca_store might be relevant too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
I think we need to provide the root_ca_certificate, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only thing required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm wondering if the root CA store or secret might be needed instead of just the certificate. I'm going to have to think about this a bit more before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If we want to use a root CA signer certificate, we'd need to provide the actual certificate, not just a store or secret. I'll go with A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Do we need to provide the root CA key as well as the certificate? I'm torn between A and B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the root CA certificate would need to be supplied, so I'll go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
5 months ago
I'm not totally confident on this, but my best guess is that the root CA certificate is what needs to be supplied, since that's the actual certificate signed by the recognized CA. I'll select A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is to consider the scale of the FTTH users and how the VLAN switching scheme needs to accommodate that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Since there's no known workaround, upgrading the kernel seems like the best way to address the vulnerability. Hiring more admins to monitor child processes doesn't really solve the root cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
10 months ago
The answer is clearly A. I mean, why would you need the private key or a secret? You just need the public certificate, right?
upvoted 0 times
Burma
9 months ago
B) root_ca_key
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
9 months ago
Exactly, the root CA certificate is all that is needed for verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
9 months ago
A) root_ca_certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecilia
10 months ago
D has to be the correct answer. A root CA secret, that's where it's at! Wait, is that even a thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucille
10 months ago
I'm going with C. A root CA store sounds like the right way to go, doesn't it?
upvoted 0 times
Marshall
9 months ago
Definitely, C is the way to go for using a root CA signer certificate signed by a recognized authority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
9 months ago
I think you're right. It's important to have the root CA store for the signer certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
10 months ago
Yes, C is the correct choice. A root CA store is needed for the custom resource.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenny
10 months ago
Wouldn't it be funny if the answer was B? Like, just hand over the private key to the root CA? That's a big no-no!
upvoted 0 times
Gianna
8 months ago
Yes, that's the correct option to supply as part of the custom resource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
8 months ago
C) root_ca_store
upvoted 0 times
...
Cary
9 months ago
No way! That would be a huge security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
10 months ago
A) root_ca_certificate
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willodean
10 months ago
Hmm, I think the answer is A. You need to provide the root CA certificate to use a recognized CA signer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) root_ca_store because it sounds like it could store the certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
11 months ago
I agree with Richelle, because the root CA signer certificate needs to be supplied before deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) root_ca_certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel